On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:27:03PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> > - i2c_transfer() has this piece:
> > 2091 if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) {
> > 2092 ret = i2c_trylock_adapter(adap);
> >
> > is this irqs_disabled() is what bothers me and should not be there.
> > pxa does a spin_lock_irq() which would enable interrupts on return /
> > too early.
> > mxs has a wait_for_completion() which needs irqs enabled _and_ makes
> > in_atomic() problematic, too. I have't checked other drivers but the
> > commit, that introduced it, does not explain why it is required.
>
> I haven't really looked into it, but a quick search gave me this thread
> explaining the intention of the code in question:
>
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2007-November/002268.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Wolfram
> And adding a recent mail address from Mike to cc.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
