Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]> writes:
...zip...
First, a question for Russell :
Given that the current PXA architecture is not implementing the
clk_round_rate() function, while implementing clk_get(), etc..., is it correct
to say that it is betraying the clk API by doing so ?
And now the answers to your mail Guennadi :
>> I've seen some patches on ALKML for PXA CCF, is it in the mainline now?
>> Could that have been the reason? Is CONFIG_COMMON_CLK defined in your
>> .config? Although, no, it's not PXA CCF, it's most probably this
No it's not in clock common framework yet.
PXA will switch to CCF in 4.2, as it missed the 4.1 merge window.
> I think I know how this is possible. PXA uses arch/arm/mach-pxa/clock.c
> for clk ops, and clk_round_rate() isn't defined there... Can we add a
> dummy for PXA? It won't be used anyway as long as PXA doesn't support CCF.
I could do it. I'm a bit reluctant because I already prepared my pull request
which fully shifts PXA to CCF, and adding a dummy function will create a merge
issue.
But is PXA the only one in this case ?
>From a first sight there are 5 ARM architectures in the same case :
rj@belgarion:~/mio_linux/kernel/arch/arm$ grep -rsl
'EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_round_rate' *
mach-davinci/clock.c
mach-lpc32xx/clock.c
mach-omap1/clock.c
plat-versatile/clock.c
rj@belgarion:~/mio_linux/kernel/arch/arm$ grep -rsl
'EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_get_rate' *
mach-davinci/clock.c
mach-ep93xx/clock.c
mach-lpc32xx/clock.c
mach-mmp/clock.c
mach-omap1/clock.c
mach-pxa/clock.c
mach-sa1100/clock.c
mach-w90x900/clock.c
plat-versatile/clock.c
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
