Linux-Misc Digest #613, Volume #25               Tue, 29 Aug 00 17:13:02 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Random Power Shutdown (jim)
  netscape problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Problems with Netscape Navigator ("Martin Duspiva")
  Re: hard drive partition table messed up! (Svend Olaf Mikkelsen)
  Re: Problems with Netscape Navigator (Kyle Parfrey)
  DCE on Linux (Charles Schwab)
  Re: Free ISPs? ("Blaine Owens")
  Re: allow certain tcpdump privileges (Svend Garnaes)
  how to mount a drive during start-up? (Henry Luk)
  Re: how to mount a drive during start-up? (Grant Edwards)
  Re: About Linux 2.4.0 (Dances With Crows)
  Re: how to mount a drive during start-up? (Dances With Crows)
  Re: Script from crontab doesn't work. (-ljl-)
  Any Kernel books ? (Michel Marcon)
  Re: Problems with Netscape Navigator ("David ..")
  Re: how to mount a drive during start-up? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: "w" and "who" do not list the same users logged in (Stewart Honsberger)
  Re: About Linux 2.4.0 (Leonard Evens)
  Re: tape drives (Leonard Evens)
  Re: how to mount a drive during start-up? (Vinny LaPietra)
  over aliasing of ls on default Mandrake 7.0 user setup ("Dan Jacobson")
  Re: Shell Programming (Vilmos Soti)
  Re: hard drive partition table messed up! (Black Dragon)
  Broadcast 2000 ("gene")
  Re: Finding your clock speed ("Sjoerd Langkemper")
  Re: Shell Programming ("Sjoerd Langkemper")
  Re: Free ISPs? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Solaris x86 won't boot from LILO (Timothy J. Lee)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jim)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Random Power Shutdown
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 12:06:15 +0000

>Gateway shipped with a 145W ATX supply.

145W?! Ye Gods, that's wimpy. I vividly remember fitting a tape streamer
to an old Acer machine with 145W supply. When I switched the machine on
the power supply failed with a FLASH-BANG!!. According to my (then)
work collegues, I moved backwards by about ten feet without actually
passing through the intervening space...! Scared the bejesus out of
me. Happy days...

Jim
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We live in the moral equivalent of black holes; beyond those
 metaphysical event horizons there exists...special circumstances."

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,alt.linux
Subject: netscape problem
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:36:55 GMT

I have linux redhat 6.2 and kde
when I start up netscape , either from command line or by icon , I find
that a blank netscape window shows up and it  is a long time before all
the netscape features are visible . so I just have to sit for a long
time.
but suppose I remove the .netscape directory , the browser starts up
relatively fast. now I have made sure that the cache is not affecting
performance . Any suggestions
thanks in advance
sandy


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: "Martin Duspiva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with Netscape Navigator
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:55:54 +0200

Hello!

I'm very happy that Linux can run on slow computers - it runs very fast on
my P75 and quite well even on old 386 (that I have for experimental
purposes)

But there's one think that troubles me - I can't find a suitable web
browser. Netscape Navigator seems to be the best choice, but it has many
problems with fonts. When I choose Type1 fonts, the text is too small and
there's no way to make it bigger (the only sizes it offers are 12 and 0).
When I choose the other fonts, it looks very ugly and it's almost impossible
to read it. Some pages are trying to set their own fonts and this results in
very small text impossible to read...

I've tried some other browsers - most of them were experimental and almost
useless, and Mozilla which looks good needs much better computer (than P75)

What shall I do? Is there a sollution? Do I have to buy faster computer just
for browsing the web? Please help me!

Thank you



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Svend Olaf Mikkelsen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: hard drive partition table messed up!
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:55:06 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>When the machine reboot, the first
>thing I see is something like "No Operating System detected".  Darn!!!

You have to provide the exact message.
-- 
Svend Olaf

------------------------------

From: Kyle Parfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems with Netscape Navigator
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:02:17 GMT

Maybe try galeon : you'd need mozilla but I hear that its faster. You can get
it from tucows.
Or maybe lynx :!
Kyle

Martin Duspiva wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I'm very happy that Linux can run on slow computers - it runs very fast on
> my P75 and quite well even on old 386 (that I have for experimental
> purposes)
>
> But there's one think that troubles me - I can't find a suitable web
> browser. Netscape Navigator seems to be the best choice, but it has many
> problems with fonts. When I choose Type1 fonts, the text is too small and
> there's no way to make it bigger (the only sizes it offers are 12 and 0).
> When I choose the other fonts, it looks very ugly and it's almost impossible
> to read it. Some pages are trying to set their own fonts and this results in
> very small text impossible to read...
>
> I've tried some other browsers - most of them were experimental and almost
> useless, and Mozilla which looks good needs much better computer (than P75)
>
> What shall I do? Is there a sollution? Do I have to buy faster computer just
> for browsing the web? Please help me!
>
> Thank you


------------------------------

From: Charles Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DCE on Linux
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 14:47:42 -0400

Anyone know if there is any effort going into a DCE port to Linux? The
last thing I saw was the Redhat 5.0/5.1 port, but that code will not run
at Redhat 6.0.

-- 
Charles Schwab (cschwab)
Numerically Intensive Computing
Ford Motor Company
313/248-1976

------------------------------

From: "Blaine Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Free ISPs?
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 14:40:12 -0400

If you know how the ISP is doing the authentication it's not too bad. Some
ISPs do tricky things, such as prefixing or appending to your account name
or password. For example, when I logon to Worldshare from Linux I have to
login as "i.wshr.myaccount".

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:8ogmjq$b3d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This message has been posted by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Dave Ewart)
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:25:16 GMT, Sjoerd Langkemper
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"Keith Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Are there any free ISPs that work with Linux [in Philadelphia]?
> >
> >Don't all ISP's work with Linux?
>
> A better question would be "Are there any ISPs to steer clear of when
> using Linux?", since I know that there were one or two here in UK that
> used a proprietary (i.e. MS-Windows only) dialer/authentication client.
> Can't remember the names of those ISPs unfortunately.
>
> So long as you can get hold of (a) the dial-up number and (b) at least
> one DNS server IP address, you shouldn't have too much trouble getting
> Linux to work.
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Ewart
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Computing Manager
> ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK



------------------------------

From: Svend Garnaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: allow certain tcpdump privileges
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:18:10 +0200

CarlG wrote:
> 
> How can I allow certain users to do a tcpdump on certain devices like
> ppp0?  I cant even get tcpdump to work so normal users can use it at
> all.  I made a copy of tcpdump to tdp and chowned and chmoded it but as
> the users, I got the messages, socket: operation not permitted.  I need
> to allow certain tcpdumps for users because I have a program that
> requires it.  Thanks.

sudo

HTH
-- 
Svend

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
From: Henry Luk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to mount a drive during start-up?
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:00:24 GMT

I have a hard drive with hda1 as windows98, and another one (hda2) as
Linux.  I know how to mount the win98 partition, but which script should I
add to mount a drive automatically during startup??  Any help is
appreciated!


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grant Edwards)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: how to mount a drive during start-up?
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:32:21 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henry Luk wrote:

>I have a hard drive with hda1 as windows98, and another one (hda2) as
>Linux.  I know how to mount the win98 partition, but which script should I
>add to mount a drive automatically during startup??  Any help is
>appreciated!

Add a line to /etc/fstab that looks something like this

/dev/hda1  /windows  vfat  defaults 0 0

Make sure you have an empty /windows directory (you can change
/windows to anythin you like -- a lot of people use /c).

Then it will get mounted next time you boot.  Or, you can mount
it right away by doing (as root)

# mount /windows

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow!  My LIBRARY CARD
                                  at               expired...
                               visi.com            

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: About Linux 2.4.0
Date: 29 Aug 2000 19:32:25 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:37:57 +0100, Benoit Smith wrote:
>I am about to install the latest Linux kernel, but I'm not sure that
>the apps that I install later (most built for 2.2.x) will be compatible
>with the new 2.4.x series. Please could someone enlighten me about that ?

Most applications will work just fine when you upgrade the kernel from
2.2.x to 2.4.x.  The only exceptions are applications that directly
manipulate kernel data structures or directly access the hardware, like
the Thinkpad Control utilities (tpctl and ntpctl).  Those applications
will ahve to be recompiled against the 2.4.x kernel headers, which is
slightly annoying, but really no big deal.  Things like Netscape, xterm,
X-servers, all the KDE and GNOME things I've tried, and even Oracle
won't even notice the difference between 2.2 and 2.4.

There's a problem with cdrecord and 2.4.x, which can be easily
fixed by adding the following line to /etc/fstab:

none            /var/shm                  shm       exec,dev,suid,rw 0 0

(You must "mkdir /var/shm" if that mount point doesn't exist already.)

I haven't seen any other incompatibilities.  

-- 
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin /  Those who do not understand Unix are
http://www.brainbench.com     /   condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
=============================/           ==Henry Spencer

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: how to mount a drive during start-up?
Date: 29 Aug 2000 19:35:50 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:00:24 GMT, Henry Luk wrote:
>I have a hard drive with hda1 as windows98, and another one (hda2) as
>Linux.  I know how to mount the win98 partition, but which script should I
>add to mount a drive automatically during startup??  Any help is
>appreciated!

Add the following line to /etc/fstab:

/dev/hda1       /mnt/win         vfat     umask=000 0   0

Change "/mnt/win" to the mount point you normally use for the FAT
partition.  The "umask=000" will let all users read and write all the
files on that partition.  If you leave that out, the FAT partition will
have all files owned by root, and only root will be able to write to
those files.  HTH,

-- 
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin /  Those who do not understand Unix are
http://www.brainbench.com     /   condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
=============================/           ==Henry Spencer

------------------------------

From: -ljl- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Script from crontab doesn't work.
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:34:23 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Kahari) wrote:
> In article <LYQq5.78513$Kw2.700974@flipper>,
> Sjoerd Langkemper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >But it works on the command line, so I don't think Lynx is the
problem.

> Lynx needs a "working terminal" to be able to start up. You have a
> "working terminal" when you run the script from the command line, but
> not when cron is running the script (I guess the $TERM variable is set
> to "unknown").
>
> If you really want to use Lynx in your script (overkill), try using it
> with the "-term=vt100" option (see man page).

This does _not_ work.  I tried:
  mm hh  *  *  *  lynx -term=vt100 www.siue.edu
got "Your terminal lacks ... the cursor"

This was on a Linux-box running TurboLinux 6.0,
lynx version 2.8.3dev.18.

But on my old faithful Linux-box running MCC-2.0+ this works:
 mm hh  *  *  *  lynx www.siue.edu
this is lynx version 2.7.1f.

Is this a lynx problem?  Not being able to fetch web-pages via cron
is a serious shortcomming.

Could some other people verify this.
--
Louis-ljl-{ Louis J. LaBash, Jr. }


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michel Marcon)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Any Kernel books ?
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:26:47 GMT

Hi

Before buying books, any one has an advice on those:

"Linux core kernel commentary" by S.E.Maxwell
"Understanding the LInux kernel" by M.Cesati and D.P.Bovet
"Linux TCP/IP stacks commentary" by S.T.Satchell and H.B.J.CLifford

I'm searching something like the old "Design of UNIX OS" by MJ.Bach
(which was excellent..)
Thanks 
cmic
================================
Michel Marcon
Sysadmin UNIX & Windows NT (I try)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: "David .." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems with Netscape Navigator
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 14:36:04 -0500

Martin Duspiva wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I'm very happy that Linux can run on slow computers - it runs very fast on
> my P75 and quite well even on old 386 (that I have for experimental
> purposes)
> 
> But there's one think that troubles me - I can't find a suitable web
> browser. Netscape Navigator seems to be the best choice, but it has many
> problems with fonts. When I choose Type1 fonts, the text is too small and
> there's no way to make it bigger (the only sizes it offers are 12 and 0).
> When I choose the other fonts, it looks very ugly and it's almost impossible
> to read it. Some pages are trying to set their own fonts and this results in
> very small text impossible to read...
> 
> I've tried some other browsers - most of them were experimental and almost
> useless, and Mozilla which looks good needs much better computer (than P75)
> 
> What shall I do? Is there a sollution? Do I have to buy faster computer just
> for browsing the web? Please help me!
> 
> Thank you

You might find this link helpful.

http://people.redhat.com/~scoile/fonts/fixing-1.html

-- 
Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
Registered with the Linux Counter.  http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to mount a drive during start-up?
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:49:14 GMT

In comp.os.linux.questions Dances With Crows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /dev/hda1       /mnt/win         vfat     umask=000 0   0

> Change "/mnt/win" to the mount point you normally use for the FAT
> partition.  The "umask=000" will let all users read and write all the
> files on that partition.  If you leave that out, the FAT partition will
> have all files owned by root, and only root will be able to write to
> those files.  HTH,

You may want to consider using uid=500,gid=500 where 500 is your
normal user id to limit access to just one user instead. 

-- 
Matt Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stewart Honsberger)
Subject: Re: "w" and "who" do not list the same users logged in
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:04:28 GMT

On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 17:49:32 +0000 (UTC), David Efflandt wrote:
>If you kill sam, he is not properly logged out, so of course the logs will
>be wrong.  Try logging him out instead (Crtl-D or logout command).

But how does one go about killing several (dozen) logged-in users? I had,
well, an Xterm incident, and long story short I ended up with about 109
Xterms loaded. I killall -9 xterm'ed the whole she-bang and my system
continues to churn away, but there are still most of these users logged
on. The solution I had before was to create dozens of Xterms and hit
"exit" in all of them. That worked, but I missed the last 24, and I don't
relish the experience of creating 109 Xterms and exit'ing them all.

-- 
Stewart Honsberger (AKA Blackdeath) @ http://tinys.cx/blackdeath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Remove 'thirteen' to reply privately)
Humming along under SuSE 6.4, Linux 2.4.0-test6

------------------------------

From: Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: About Linux 2.4.0
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:04:15 -0500

Benoit Smith wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I am about to install the latest Linux kernel, but I'm not sure that
> the apps that I install later (most built for 2.2.x) will be compatible
> with the new 2.4.x series. Please could someone enlighten me about that ?
> 
> Any help would be appreciated,
> 
> Benoit Smith

I don't think anyone can give you a definitive answer to that
question.  But I think it is save to assume that any application
which may not be compatible with the latest kernel will be upgraded
pretty quickly to a compatible version.  The vast majority of
applications will probably remain compatible.   Since you can
have both a 2.2 kernel and the new kernel, you don't really have
much to lose by trying.

-- 

Leonard Evens      [EMAIL PROTECTED]      847-491-5537
Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208

------------------------------

From: Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: tape drives
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:01:28 -0500

dave frost wrote:
> 
> hi all,
> 
> can anyone suggest a good quality tape drive that will work well under
> linux - in particular suse linux.
> 
> cheers
> 
> dave

I have been using the HP internal IDE drive for a few years,
and it seems more than adequate.  These drives seem to vary
in capacity between 2.5 and 5 BG or more.  It is by far the
least expensive alternative as far as I can see.  

-- 

Leonard Evens      [EMAIL PROTECTED]      847-491-5537
Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208

------------------------------

From: Vinny LaPietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: how to mount a drive during start-up?
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:59:21 GMT

If the hda1 drive is not being mounted automatically it must have the
noauto option specified in /etc/fstab. Just remove that option and it
should be mounted at boot time.

Vinny

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Henry Luk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a hard drive with hda1 as windows98, and another one (hda2) as
> Linux.  I know how to mount the win98 partition, but which script
should I
> add to mount a drive automatically during startup??  Any help is
> appreciated!
>
>


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: over aliasing of ls on default Mandrake 7.0 user setup
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 18:51:41 +0800

Over aliasing of ls found on default Mandrake 7.0 user setup:
$ ls C*
CHECK.dbx*  CHECK.dbx.mbx  <<<note helpful * to show executable
$ ls C* > n                <<<bad place for helpful * here!
$ cp `cat n` /var/tmp
cp: overwrite `/var/tmp/CHECK.dbx.mbx'?  <<<[could have been a lot worse]
$ echo `cat n`
CHECK.dbx CHECK.dbx.mbx CHECK.dbx.mbx
$ alias l ll ls
alias l='ls'
alias ll='ls -l'
alias ls='ls -N -F'

isn't l, ll good enough?  Why do they have to break ls?
--
www.geocities.com/jidanni  ... fix e-mail address to reply; �n����
Tel:+886-4-5854780; starting in year 2001: +886-4-25854780



------------------------------

Subject: Re: Shell Programming
From: Vilmos Soti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:22:02 GMT

"Bradley J. Bartram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> What I want to do is take a script, be able to count howmany times it's run,
> use that value in another variable and exit the script after say 2000 times
> through.  Any input?

It is not clear. Do you want something like a for loop?

$ x=3; while [ $x != "8" ]; do echo $x; x=$(($x + 1)); done
3
4
5
6
7
$ echo $x
8
$

Vilmos

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Black Dragon)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: hard drive partition table messed up!
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:40:23 GMT


On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:47:28 GMT in comp.os.linux.setup,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `[EMAIL PROTECTED]' said:

>Hello all,  I was trying to format my 8GB Maxtor drive the other day
>with Windows NT 4.0 so that I can free up some space for linux.  The
>whole drive had NT before, so I used the NT 4.0 boot disk to boot up and
>delete the old partition and then create a new smaller one, 3GB.  The
>setup then proceed to format the smaller partition for NTFS.  Half way
>through the power to the PC was accidentally disconnected.  So then I
>redo the process, but now the NT setup thinks that the whole drive is
>only 3GB, Darn!!!  So I figure maybe go ahead and install NT and
>hopefully Linux installation will figure out the extra space later.
>
>Anyway, I went ahead and installed NT on that 3GB partition, that's all
>the damn NT OS will see.  So after the NT installation was completed, it
>asked me to restart my machine.  When the machine reboot, the first
>thing I see is something like "No Operating System detected".  Darn!!!
>
>I boot up with my Linux boot disk and did an CFDISK and wow! the whole
>8GB is there and that @@#$ing! 3GB NT partition is also still there.
>But the @#$@ing thing won't boot.  Only reason I need NT is because at
>work we develop in NT, otherwise I would put the penguin on my whole PC.
>
>Anyway, does anyone out there know how I can get my Maxtor 8GB to boot
>again?  I rather not post to comp.os.windows.nt because you know how I
>feel about it.  Thanks a lot.


It sounds like your partition tables are screwed, read on. . . 

I had a similar thing happen to a 6.4GB WD drive in a NT box at work while
installing an Iomega Zip drive not to long ago. After attempting to 
re-partition it with disk-administrator and format it in another NT box after
attempting to re-install NT on the original machine with no luck, and then 
attempt to install NT on it twice only to have it not boot, twice, again, I
gave up, brought it home, stuck it in my Linux box, ran fdisk on it, printed 
the  partition table, and lo-and-behold, the three partitions ended in the 
middle  of cylinders (supposed to end at the end of a cylinder) and were 
crossed  (over lapped) to boot. In other words, the partition tables were 
fucked, and nothing I did with NT warned me about it, it just proceeded to 
waste my time. I also tried fdisk from a DOS 6.22 system floppy at work. 
Nada. With Linux fdisk, I just created a new empty dos partition table, exited
fdisk to save  the changes, re-entered fdisk, created one primary, and two 
logical dos partitions, took the drive back to the shop, formated it and 
successfully and finally had the box back up and running after the usual 
re-boot it 15-20 times song and dance routine.
  
-- 
Black Dragon

"Resist militant `normality' -- A mind is a terrible thing to erase."

------------------------------

From: "gene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Broadcast 2000
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:31:28 -0600

I got bcast2000 compiled now I can't figure how to install it. Anyone know
how to perform this task?

Thanks,

Gene Imes


------------------------------

From: "Sjoerd Langkemper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Finding your clock speed
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:45:37 GMT

"Naren Devaiah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cat /proc/cpuinfo

Argh! The first line indicates I have zero CPU's in my computer! So what's
my clock speed?

processor       : 0
vendor_id       : CyrixInstead
cpu family      : 4
model           : 4
model name      : Cx486DX2
stepping        : 2
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
sep_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : -1
wp              : yes
flags           :
bogomips        : 31.85



------------------------------

From: "Sjoerd Langkemper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Shell Programming
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:47:49 GMT

"Bradley J. Bartram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [I want to do something 2000 times]

Email bombing is bad.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Free ISPs?
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:44:32 GMT

In article <wBQq5.78402$Kw2.697455@flipper>,
  "Sjoerd Langkemper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Keith Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are there any free ISPs that work with Linux [in Philadelphia]?
>
> Don't all ISP's work with Linux?
>
> Sjoerd
>
>

Those free isp putting a view bar on your
Winxx screen don't work with linux.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy J. Lee)
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.solaris,alt.solaris.x86
Subject: Solaris x86 won't boot from LILO
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (this is a valid address for a limited time)
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:52:05 GMT

I installed Solaris 8 x86 onto a computer with the following ATA disk
configuration:

Primary master:  3.2GB ATA disk with Linux (SuSE 6.3, but newer kernels
        and patches).
Primary slave:  4.3GB ATA disk that now has Solaris 8 x86 on it.
Secondary master:  ATAPI CD-ROM

I installed by booting Software CD 1 instead of the Install CD, thanks
to those who replied in the previous thread.

After installing Solaris 8 x86, I reconfigured LILO on Linux with

other = /dev/hdb
        label = solaris 

reran /sbin/lilo, and rebooted.  When the LILO: prompt came, I typed
solaris.  Then, across the top of the screen, came:

Solaris Boot Sector=========================================    Version 2

but then it just stopped.

Solaris 8 x86 boots properly if the computer's BIOS is set to boot from
D instead of C.  What could be preventing it from booting from LILO?

-- 
========================================================================
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to