On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Anderson Briglia <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Nitin Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Anderson, >> >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Anderson Briglia <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm back to old Compressed Cache working (now it's ramzswap). Well, >>> I'd like to know if that chunks approach is still being used. I >>> noticed that a new allocator was specially implemented for ramzswap >>> but is it using chunks approach for compressed pages storage? >>> >> >> xvMalloc allocator is completely different from "chunks" based approach >> used in very early patches (which you worked on). > > Humm.. as I suspected. :) > Maybe should I take a look that paper about TLSF? I read in project's > site that xvMalloc is based in TLSF. > >>
Yes, xvMalloc is based on TLSF. You can find more about it here: http://compcache.googlecode.com/svn/wiki/files/xvmalloc/xvMalloc.pdf http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/xvMalloc Nitin _______________________________________________ linux-mm-cc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/linux-mm-cc
