On Mon 2009-09-14 22:05:10, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:51:17 +0200
> Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri 2009-09-11 23:45:01, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> > >
> > > Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume - if
> > > some users wants to crash his card by randomly swapping it during
> > > suspend/resume - I'd have no problem with that....
> >
> > Well, I do have small problem with that :-).
> >
> > Anyway, patch for rechecking IDs would probably be accepted, but
> > that's not how it works now.
>
> It _does_ check the card id when you have UNSAFE_RESUME selected. It
> doesn't just hook up whatever card you happen to have in the slot with
> your old block device. I may have a lot of opponents when it comes
> to my suspend design choices, but I'm not completely crazy. ;)
:-) Ok, ok. Patch checking filesystem timestamps would be welcome in
that case ;-).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
