Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You'll still need typecasts to support the dma_request_channel()
> > callback, but the code will be safer and cleaner, I expect.
>
> My concern are:
> 1/ allow the use of either dmaengine driver
> 2/ avoid too much modification to dw_dma_slave as it
> is also used for audio stuff on avr32 platforms...
> 3/ not introduce heavy weigh solution like the use of an union
We used to have a struct dma_slave in linux/dmaengine.h which took care
of all this, but it got removed at some point.
How about introducing a new mach/atmel-mci.h file with a struct
mci_dma_data encapsulating either a struct dw_dma_slave or a struct
at_dma_slave, as well as any other DMA-related definitions needed by
the atmel-mci driver?
Then we just need to make sure that we either
1) use the same name on all fields in struct {dw,at}_dma_slave which
are used by the atmel-mci driver, or
2) add accessor functions or macros for those fields.
I think I would prefer the latter, but both should work equally well.
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
