Hi Kyungmin, > It's already patched. you can find it easily at list.
I think you're talking about this patch from Zhangfei: From: Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:15:32 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] sdhci: support MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]> Acked-by: Matt Fleming <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]> --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c index 7855121..913555e 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c @@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host) mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA; if (caps & SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD) - mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED; + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED; if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION) mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL; -- But this patch wasn't sent to Andrew either -- and so isn't in Linus' or Andrew's tree -- and it's also only one of the two hunks in George's earlier patch. George also had: --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c @@ -1180,7 +1180,8 @@ static void sdhci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios) else ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_4BITBUS; - if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_SD_HS && + if ((ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_SD_HS || + ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS) && !(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_HISPD_BIT)) ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_HISPD; else So, we still have to send a patch to Andrew, and decide which patch it should be. What do you think? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
