On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 12:08:58 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Here is a patch which brings possibility to get test results via sysfs. It > >> helps to do tests non-interactively. > >> > >> We have the file created under sysfs already and we could use it to out > >> test > >> results. > > > > So what we end up with is extremely thin. __Something about adding > > something to sysfs. > Yeah, agree with you. How to proceed with commit messages? > Should I make newer version of this certain patch with updated commit message? > I used the words which Chris sent: : Make it possibile to get test results via sysfs. It helps to do tests : non-interactively. : : We have the file created under sysfs already and we could use it to out test : results. : : Prior to this patch, the "test" file under each card's sysfs node was : write-only, and results were obtained by looking at dmesg. This patch : improves programmatic access to the test results, making them available by : reading back from the same "test" file: : : [r...@host mmc0:e624]# echo 6 > test : [r...@host mmc0:e624]# cat test : Test 6: 2 : : [[email protected]: changelog improvements] : Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> : Cc: Chris Ball <[email protected]> : Cc: <[email protected]> which is good enough. You can send me replacement changelog text any old time - it's not problem. I'm forever editing changelogs, mainly adding acked-by's etc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
