> > should detect that BUG never returns). The include-removal could be in a > > seperate patch, not sure if it is worth, though. > > It can include in a separate patch. > It makes sense if apply the previous patch to split the header file > because we remove duplicated include files.
I understand, but I am still sceptical. If the source file itself uses something from the h-file, it should include it IMHO. Don't know if it is common sense this way. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
