On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:20:27PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > this patch fix timeout problems on i.MX's sdhci as suggested by > Richard Zhu. > > Tested on : > - i.MX257 : not needed > - i.MX357 : needed > - i.MX515 : needed > > more details can be found here : > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-October/029748.html > > Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <[email protected]> > Tested-by: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > index afbac9a..11e1ae1 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > @@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ static int esdhc_pltfm_init(struct sdhci_host *host, > struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pd > gpio_request(boarddata->wp_gpio, "SD_WP"); > gpio_direction_input(boarddata->wp_gpio); > } > + > + if (cpu_is_mx35() || cpu_is_mx51()) { > + dev_info(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "using broken timeout quirk\n"); > + host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL; > + } > + > return 0; > } >
This has Wolfram's RFC wp-on-gpio patch applied. Want to repost these against mmc-next? I'll plan on leaving this until after -rc1, so that I can send out a pull request shortly. Thanks, -- Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
