On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> Maybe the runtime PM stuff is not the right abstraction for this? > > Hm, yeah the bad thing is that I can't reuse the delay code > from runtime PM.
Why not ? > But all the hazzle of creating dummy devices > nodes just to reuse runtime PM is even more disturbing. Yeah creating dummy devices is not a good approach. > Can I take this as your Acked-by: for the v7 patch using the old > host-local approach? FWIW, I don't mind helping out with the runtime PM migration, so if you prefer to push v7 I could take it from there (when I get to it...). > > Linus Walleij > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
