On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 +
> >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169
> >>+++++++++++++++++++++
> >>How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm")
> >>instead of "Documentation"?
> >>Just a thought... ;-)
> >
> >Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet.
> >It would be good to get some consensus before creating it.
>
> I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space
> tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were
> moved to "tools/perf".
>
> Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or
> "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-)
>
I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long
way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others
have sunk to arch/<foo>/tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit
of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
