On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 08:22:12PM +0000, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 06:48:39PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Hmm, for now I don't have a better alternative, but I somehow hink there > > must > > be a better solution than to add one hook per [...] > > If there still isn't a better alternative in mind, I'm thinking about > going ahead and taking this patch, and then reusing the quirk bit for > Chuanxiao's "mmc: set a suitable max_discard_sectors value for HC" > patchset.
What about using the SZ_2048 quirk instead which could be done via io-accessors? That being said, I have a train travel tomorrow and will try to see if a fixup() function would make sense for this one. Can you wait one more day? Thanks, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
