On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On sh-mobile platforms the SDHI driver was using the tmio_mmc SD/SDIO
> MFD cell driver. Now that the tmio_mmc driver has been split into a
> core and a separate MFD glue, we can support SDHI natively without the
> need to emulate an MFD controller. This also allows to support systems
> with an on-SoC SDHI controller and a separate MFD with a TMIO core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
> ---
Nice, I believe this is the right direction..
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct tmio_mmc_host {
> struct tasklet_struct dma_complete;
> struct tasklet_struct dma_issue;
> struct scatterlist bounce_sg;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TMIO_MMC_DMA
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MMC_SDHI) || defined(CONFIG_MMC_SDHI_MODULE)
> u8 bounce_buf[PAGE_CACHE_SIZE]
> __attribute__((aligned(TMIO_MAX_ALIGN)));
> #else
> u8 bounce_buf[1]; /* A dummy in no-DMA case */
... but it would be nice if all this #ifdeffery could be avoided somehow.
Is it possible to use devres to allocate the bounce buffer dynamically
in the dma portion of the code?
/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html