On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Andrei Warkentin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Andrei Warkentin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This resolves the deadlock issue with suspend. There is no
>> need to claim host before the remove op.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <[email protected]>
>
> Frank,
>
> Can you try this out? I think this fixes it.
>
> Ohad,
>
> I think this means we can take
> 1c8cf9c997a4a6b36e907c7ede5f048aeaab1644 out (mmc: sdio: fix SDIO
> suspend/resume regression). What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> A
>

Ohad, nevermind.

I think there is a bigger issue here at stake for removeable cards. If
you have a mounted file system,
the usage count for mmc_blk usage will never drop enough to remove the device!

I think the block.c for removal needs to change somewhat. Removed MDs
need to clear devidx and be put on an "orphan list" from where
they will remove themselves if usage count drops to zero. On re-probe,
the "orphan list" needs to be scanned for allocated devidx, and if it
is found, then that MD should be reused.
I'll see if I can put something together.

A
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to