> > In my opinion this is more risky than the original patch because this > > will affect the behavior on all controllers that use sdhci, and not > > just on those ones that don't update SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS themselves. > > Comments welcome! > > Any thoughts on which of the two approaches you prefer?
Thanks for the ping. I prefer the latter approach but it should be given enough time testing in -next. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
