On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:02:14PM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: > I was blindly trusting code already in mainline again, and for that I > apologize, I finally took the time to look at the implementation > of IS_ERR() and test its use, and being IS_ERR(NULL) true it is not what > we want indeed, see the attached test program. > > So, I am going to remove the ifdefs anyway but use IS_ERR_OR_NULL(); > how does that sound? Am I still missing anything?
That sounds a lot better, and should avoid the issue which caused me to throw out the original patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
