Hello Nicolas,

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:49:41PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Take care of slots while going to suspend state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
> ---
> V2: move to pm_ops
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c |   47 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> index aa8039f..058f1842 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> @@ -1878,10 +1878,57 @@ static int __exit atmci_remove(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int atmci_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +     struct atmel_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +     struct atmel_mci_slot *slot;
> +     int i, ret;
slot and ret can have a more local scope.

> +
> +      for (i = 0; i < ATMEL_MCI_MAX_NR_SLOTS; i++) {
> +             slot = host->slot[i];
> +             if (!slot)
> +                     continue;
> +             ret = mmc_suspend_host(slot->mmc);
> +             if (ret < 0) {
> +                     while (--i >= 0) {
> +                             slot = host->slot[i];
> +                             if (slot)
> +                                     mmc_resume_host(host->slot[i]->mmc);
hmm, mmc_resume_host could fail. But probably you cannot handle that in
a sane way, do you?

> +                     }
> +                     return ret;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int atmci_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +     struct atmel_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +     struct atmel_mci_slot *slot;
> +     int i, ret;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < ATMEL_MCI_MAX_NR_SLOTS; i++) {
> +             slot = host->slot[i];
> +             if (!slot)
> +                     continue;
> +             ret = mmc_resume_host(slot->mmc);
> +             if (ret < 0)
> +                     return ret;
Maybe you should try to resume host 5 even if resuming host 4 failed?

> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(atmci_pm, atmci_suspend, atmci_resume);
> +
> +
For my taste a single empty line is enough.

>  static struct platform_driver atmci_driver = {
>       .remove         = __exit_p(atmci_remove),
>       .driver         = {
>               .name           = "atmel_mci",
> +             .pm             = &atmci_pm,
>       },
>  };

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to