On 13 July 2011 10:02, Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I send to mailing for [RFC] Kernel NULL pointer dereference.
> This patch is fixed it.
>
> In similar case, when discard request, check condition and
> performed mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, NULL) for ongoing async transfer.
>
> But When flush request, entered the mmc_blk_issue_flush() then return.
> (then didn't complete ongoing aync transfer).
>
> I think that need to complete for ongoing aync transfer before flush request.
>
I did consider this when I added the check for discard but I didn't
realize it is necessary for flush too.
There is no real downside of completing the async request before flush
in terms of performance anyway.
Thanks for catching this bug.
> @@ -1200,6 +1200,9 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq,
> struct request *req)
> else
> ret = mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq(mq, req);
> } else if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) {
> + /* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing flush */
> + if (card->host->areq)
> + mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, NULL);
These 2 lines are the same as for the discard condition. I still
prefer 2 lines of repeating code rather than one big if-statement
covering both discard and flush.
Acked-by: Per Forlin <[email protected]>
Regards,
Per
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html