Hi,
On Wed, Jul 13 2011, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> it seems this series got lost in time, at least patches 01, 02, 03,
> 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 12 look like valid standalone fixes and
> improvements to me, they don't touch other trees and still apply
> cleanly, so would be good to have.
Yeah. I didn't merge them because Tony still has unanswered comments on
the OMAP side of the patches, and they're submitted as a single patchset.
I've applied {2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12} to mmc-next for 3.1 now. 1 doesn't
apply because the function doesn't exist anymore. 4 doesn't apply
because iclk doesn't exist anymore.
If someone wants to look at rebasing the rest of these against mmc-next
and resubmitting, I think that'd be useful.
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <[email protected]> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
