On 05/10/11 18:33, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
Hi,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Namjae Jeon"<[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], "adrian 
hunter"<[email protected]>, "linus walleij"
<[email protected]>, "james p freyensee"<[email protected]>, 
[email protected], "Ulf Hansson"
<[email protected]>, "stefan xk nilsson"<[email protected]>, 
"per forlin"
<[email protected]>, "johan rudholm"<[email protected]>, "Namjae 
Jeon"<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 10:45:45 AM
Subject: [PATCH v11] mmc : general purpose partition support.

It allows gerneral purpose partitions in MMC Device.
And I try to simpliy make mmc_blk_alloc_parts using mmc_part
structure suggested by Andrei Warkentin.
After patching, we can see general purpose partitions like this.
cat /proc/partitions
           179 0 847872 mmcblk0
           179 192 4096 mmcblk0gp3
           179 160 4096 mmcblk0gp2
           179 128 4096 mmcblk0gp1
           179 96  1052672 mmcblk0gp0
           179 64  1024 mmcblk0boot1
           179 32  1024 mmcblk0boot0

Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon<[email protected]>
---
  drivers/mmc/card/block.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
  drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c   |   52
  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  include/linux/mmc/card.h |   34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  include/linux/mmc/mmc.h  |    5 +++-
  4 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+       for (idx = 0; idx<  card->nr_parts; idx++) {
+               if (mmc_is_boot_partition(&card->part[idx])&&
+                       !mmc_boot_partition_access(card->host))
+                       continue;
+               if (card->part[idx].size) {
+                       ret = mmc_blk_alloc_part(card, md,
+                               card->part[idx].part_cfg,
+                               card->part[idx].size>>  9,
+                               card->part[idx].force_ro,
+                               card->part[idx].name);
+                       if (ret)
+                               return ret;
+               }
        }

Is there any reason for putting the mmc_boot_partition_access() logic here? If
boot partitions are not allowed by host, then just don't add the mmc_parts to
the parts array, no? Such minutae should belong in core mmc code, not block 
driver, IMHO.

I like data structures to model reality i.e. the partitions exist but are not accessible. However I am not fussed - change it or not.


A


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to