Hi,

On 10/17/2011 08:05 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> In dw_mmc 2.40a spec, Data register's offset is changed.
> Now we used Data register offset is 0x100. but if somebody use 2.40a
> controller, must use 0x200 for Data register.
> 
> This patch is added version-id checking point and using SDMMC_DATA(x)
> instead of SDMMC_DATA. (assume 2.40a is the latest version)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c  |   66 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h  |   10 ++++++-
>  include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h |    2 +
>  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 701f14e..3aaeb08 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -1043,7 +1043,8 @@ static void dw_mci_push_data16(struct dw_mci *host, 
> void *buf, int cnt)
>               buf += len;
>               cnt -= len;
>               if (!sg_next(host->sg) || host->part_buf_count == 2) {
> -                     mci_writew(host, DATA, host->part_buf16);
> +                     mci_writew(host, DATA(host->data_offset),
> +                                     host->part_buf16);
>                       host->part_buf_count = 0;
>               }
>       }

I really think it would be more concise to just have something like this:
mci_writew(host, host->data_offset, host->part_buf16);
...

> +#define DATA_OFFSET          0
> +#define DATA_240A_OFFSET     0x100

and then have these as register positions like the other #defines, e.g.
#define SDMMC_DATA      0x100
#define SDMMC_DATA_240A 0x200

> @@ -1952,6 +1964,18 @@ static int dw_mci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       }
>  
>       /*
> +      * In 2.40a spec, Data offset is changed.
> +      * Need to check the version-id and set data-offset for DATA register.
> +      */
> +     host->verid = SDMMC_GET_VERID(mci_readl(host, VERID));
> +     dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Version ID is %04x\n", host->verid);
> +
> +     if (host->verid < DW_MMC_240A)
> +             host->data_offset = DATA_OFFSET;
> +     else
> +             host->data_offset = DATA_240A_OFFSET;
> +
> +     /*
>        * Enable interrupts for command done, data over, data empty, card det,
>        * receive ready and error such as transmit, receive timeout, crc error
>        */
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> index bfa3c1c..965fd19 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>  #ifndef _DW_MMC_H_
>  #define _DW_MMC_H_
>  
> +#define DW_MMC_240A          0x240a
> +
>  #define SDMMC_CTRL           0x000
>  #define SDMMC_PWREN          0x004
>  #define SDMMC_CLKDIV         0x008
> @@ -51,7 +53,11 @@
>  #define SDMMC_IDINTEN                0x090
>  #define SDMMC_DSCADDR                0x094
>  #define SDMMC_BUFADDR                0x098
> -#define SDMMC_DATA           0x100
> +#define SDMMC_DATA(x)                (0x100 + (x))
> +
> +/* Data offset is difference according to Verision */

should that be "version"?

> +#define DATA_OFFSET          0
> +#define DATA_240A_OFFSET     0x100
>  
>  /* shift bit field */
>  #define _SBF(f, v)           ((v) << (f))
> @@ -130,6 +136,8 @@
>  #define SDMMC_IDMAC_ENABLE           BIT(7)
>  #define SDMMC_IDMAC_FB                       BIT(1)
>  #define SDMMC_IDMAC_SWRESET          BIT(0)
> +/* Version ID register define */
> +#define SDMMC_GET_VERID(x)           ((x) & 0xFFFF)
>  
>  /* Register access macros */
>  #define mci_readl(dev, reg)                  \
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
> index 6b46819..6928e29 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ struct dw_mci {
>       u32                     current_speed;
>       u32                     num_slots;
>       u32                     fifoth_val;
> +     u16                     verid;
> +     u16                     data_offset;
>       struct platform_device  *pdev;
>       struct dw_mci_board     *pdata;
>       struct dw_mci_slot      *slot[MAX_MCI_SLOTS];

The kerneldoc comment above struct dw_mci should be updated to describe
the new fields.

Other than that it looks good to me.

Thanks
James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to