Yes,
Please find the attachment for the user space application.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:50 PM, S, Venkatraman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Shashidhar Hiremath
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Venkatraman,
>> If I understand correctly, You want the test_cmds.c file to be
>> compiled conditionally based on the menuconfig option for
>> CONFIG_MMC_TEST right ?
>
> Yes.
> BTW, do you have any user space utilities for testing this ?
> I'd be inclined to give it a run.
>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:04 PM, S, Venkatraman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Shashidhar Hiremath
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> The patch provides An infrastructure to test commands other than
>>>> Read/Write commands using the IOCTL interface.The Patch can be useful
>>>> incase of validating the device to verify whether device support a given
>>>> command or not. The result of the sent command will be written to the
>>>> result element of the mmc_ioc_cmd structure passed through IOCTL interface.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shashidhar Hiremath <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mmc/card/Makefile | 2 +-
>>>> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 28 ++
>>>> drivers/mmc/card/test_cmds.c | 743
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/mmc/card/test_cmds.h | 53 +++
>>>> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 4 +
>>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 4 +
>>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 1 +
>>>> drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 2 +
>>>> include/linux/mmc/ioctl.h | 1 +
>>>> 9 files changed, 837 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/card/test_cmds.c
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/card/test_cmds.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/Makefile b/drivers/mmc/card/Makefile
>>>> index c73b406..ea52ee1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/Makefile
>>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>>> #
>>>>
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK) += mmc_block.o
>>>> -mmc_block-objs := block.o queue.o
>>>> +mmc_block-objs := block.o queue.o test_cmds.o
>>>
>>> Why should it be included by default ?
>>> I think it belongs under CONFIG_MMC_TEST
>>>
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_TEST) += mmc_test.o
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> regards,
>> Shashidhar Hiremath
>>
>
--
regards,
Shashidhar Hiremath
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <linux/mmc/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#define DEV_NAME "/dev/mmcblk0"
#define MMC_BLOCK_MAJOR 179
static struct mmc_ioc_cmd mmc_local_cmd;
int main(void)
{
int fd, ret_val,opcode;
printf("Please Enter the Command Index to be tested \n");
scanf("%d",&opcode);
mmc_local_cmd.opcode = opcode,
mmc_local_cmd.write_flag = 2,
mmc_local_cmd.data_ptr = (int)NULL,
fd = open(DEV_NAME, O_RDWR);
if (fd < 0) {
printf("cannot open device file: %s\n", DEV_NAME);
return -1;
}
ioctl(fd,MMC_IOC_CMD,&mmc_local_cmd);
if(mmc_local_cmd.result == 0)
printf("\nResult: OK\nTest Passed");
else if(mmc_local_cmd.result == 1)
printf("\nResult: Failed");
else if(mmc_local_cmd.result == 2)
printf("\nResult: Command Not Supported");
else if(mmc_local_cmd.result == 3)
printf("\nResult: Card Not Supported");
else {
printf("\nResult:ERROR %d Occured",mmc_local_cmd.result);
printf("\nResult: Please see Kernel log messages for detail");
}
close(fd);
return 0;
}
