Just two minor style issues in this patch.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 06:43:01PM +0530, Tanmay Upadhyay wrote:
> +static inline int pxa168_add_sdh(int id, struct sdhci_pxa_platdata *data)
> +{
> + struct pxa_device_desc *d = NULL;
> +
> + switch (id) {
> + case 1: d = &pxa168_device_sdh1; break;
> + case 2: d = &pxa168_device_sdh2; break;
> + case 3: d = &pxa168_device_sdh3; break;
> + case 4: d = &pxa168_device_sdh4; break;
Style.
case X:
d = &y;
break;
> +static void sdh_clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + __raw_writel(__raw_readl(clk->clk_rst) & ~(clk->enable_val),
Parens around clk->enable_val not required.
> + INIT_CLKREG(&clk_sdh1, NULL, "PXA-SDHCLK"),
> + INIT_CLKREG(&clk_sdh2, NULL, "PXA-SDHCLK"),
> + INIT_CLKREG(&clk_sdh3, NULL, "PXA-SDHCLK"),
> + INIT_CLKREG(&clk_sdh4, NULL, "PXA-SDHCLK"),
So these clocks are registered with the same name? How are they
distinguished by clk_get()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
