Hi Ulf.

I tested with this patch.
But in my environment, this patch didn't work fine before.
1) When remove/insert, didn't entered the suspend.
2) When removed during something write,
[   50.755067] FAT-fs (mmcblk1p1): Directory bread(block 8254) failed
[   50.761235] FAT-fs (mmcblk1p1): Directory bread(block 8255) failed
then at next-time, didn't detect sd-card.

Did you know this?
If you want more information, i will debug, and share the result.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

On 03/02/2012 12:44 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:

> Make sure mmc_start_req cancel the prepared job, if the request
> was prevented to be started due to the card has been removed.
> 
> This bug was introduced in commit:
> mmc: allow upper layers to know immediately if card has been removed
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c |   35 +++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 0b317f0..9e562ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -249,16 +249,17 @@ static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
>       complete(&mrq->completion);
>  }
>  
> -static void __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> +static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>  {
>       init_completion(&mrq->completion);
>       mrq->done = mmc_wait_done;
>       if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
>               mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>               complete(&mrq->completion);
> -             return;
> +             return -ENOMEDIUM;
>       }
>       mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
> +     return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
> @@ -342,6 +343,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
>                                   struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
>  {
>       int err = 0;
> +     int start_err = 0;
>       struct mmc_async_req *data = host->areq;
>  
>       /* Prepare a new request */
> @@ -351,30 +353,23 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host 
> *host,
>       if (host->areq) {
>               mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
>               err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq);
> -             if (err) {
> -                     /* post process the completed failed request */
> -                     mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
> -                     if (areq)
> -                             /*
> -                              * Cancel the new prepared request, because
> -                              * it can't run until the failed
> -                              * request has been properly handled.
> -                              */
> -                             mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
> -
> -                     host->areq = NULL;
> -                     goto out;
> -             }
>       }
>  
> -     if (areq)
> -             __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
> +     if (!err && areq)
> +             start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
>  
>       if (host->areq)
>               mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
>  
> -     host->areq = areq;
> - out:
> +     if (err || start_err) {
> +             if (areq)
> +                     /* The prepared request was not started, cancel it. */
> +                     mmc_post_req(host, areq->mrq, -EINVAL);
> +             host->areq = NULL;
> +     } else {
> +             host->areq = areq;
> +     }
> +
>       if (error)
>               *error = err;
>       return data;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to