On Mon, 21 May 2012, Marek Vasut wrote: > The write-protect GPIO is inverted on some boards. Handle such case. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> > Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: Chris Ball <[email protected]> > Cc: Lothar Waßmann <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c > index 277161d..9bfd08e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c > @@ -164,16 +164,23 @@ struct mxs_mmc_host { > spinlock_t lock; > int sdio_irq_en; > int wp_gpio; > + int wp_inverted:1;
I think, many mmc drivers could use such a flag, so, I proposed this http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg14018.html and I'm planning to respin that entire patch-series, taking reviews into account. However, that specific patch doesn't depend on anything, so, it can be taken directly. Then drivers would just use the new CAP2 flag, instead of adding similar flags to their private data. Another advantage of having that flag centrally is, that it will enable its use from the slot function helper module http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg14031.html which I'll also respin soon. Thanks Guennadi > }; > > static int mxs_mmc_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc) > { > struct mxs_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > + int ret; > > if (!gpio_is_valid(host->wp_gpio)) > return -EINVAL; > > - return gpio_get_value(host->wp_gpio); > + ret = gpio_get_value(host->wp_gpio); > + > + if (host->wp_inverted) > + ret = !ret; > + > + return ret; > } > > static int mxs_mmc_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) > @@ -707,6 +714,7 @@ static int mxs_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct pinctrl *pinctrl; > int ret = 0, irq_err, irq_dma; > dma_cap_mask_t mask; > + enum of_gpio_flags flags; > > iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > dmares = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_DMA, 0); > @@ -785,7 +793,10 @@ static int mxs_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA; > else if (bus_width == 8) > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA; > - host->wp_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wp-gpios", 0); > + host->wp_gpio = of_get_named_gpio_flags(np, "wp-gpios", 0, > + &flags); > + if (flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) > + host->wp_inverted = 1; > } else { > if (pdata->flags & SLOTF_8_BIT_CAPABLE) > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA; > -- > 1.7.10 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
