Hi Seungwon, On 07/20/2012 08:36 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: > Hi Jaehoon, > > July 20, 2012, Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]> >> Fixed the below message. >> >> WARNING: drivers/mmc/host/built-in.o(.text+0x5ee8): Section mismatch in >> reference from the function >> dw_mci_probe() to the function .init.text:dw_mci_init_slot() >> The function dw_mci_probe() references >> the function __init dw_mci_init_slot(). >> This is often because dw_mci_probe lacks a __init >> annotation or the annotation of dw_mci_init_slot is wrong >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c >> index 72dc3cd..7955eba 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c >> @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ static void dw_mci_work_routine_card(struct >> work_struct *work) >> } >> } >> >> -static int __init dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id) >> +static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id) >> { >> struct mmc_host *mmc; >> struct dw_mci_slot *slot; > > > __init macro isn't required? > If so, how about adding __init macros to dw_mci_probe and dw_mci_pltfm_probe? As you're mentioned, I think right that add __init macro to dw_mci_pltfm_probe. but dw_mci_probe? i didn't think so...
Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > > Best regards, > Seungwon Jeon >> -- >> 1.7.4.1 >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in >> the body of a message to [email protected] >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
