On Tuesday, August 29, 2012, Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 10:21 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 28, 2012, Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> synopsys spec is mentioned. (7.1 Software/Hardware Restrictions)
> >> "Before disabling clock, ensure that card is not busy due to any previous 
> >> data command."
> >>
> >> At specific board, i found the problem that didn't inform ciu.
> >> (It didn't produce always.)
> >> At that time, i checked the status register whether card is busy or not.
> >> (Start bit of CMD register is cleared, but card is busy.)
> >> Current code didn't check the card status. Just check whether the 
> >> start-bit cleared.
> >> host regard that command is completed, will send the next command.
> >> But next command didn't issue because Card is busy.
> >> This patch can prevent this situation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> >>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h |    1 +
> >>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >> index 36f98c0..e30d3ed 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> >> @@ -623,6 +623,24 @@ static void mci_send_cmd(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, 
> >> u32 cmd, u32 arg)
> >>            cmd, arg, cmd_status);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +static void dw_mci_inform_ciu(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> >> +{
> >> +  struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> >> +  unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10);
> > 10ms is from test?
> It's tested...it's not exactly value..but never spent the time.
> >
> >> +  u32 ctrl, status;
> >> +
> >> +  do {
> >> +          status = mci_readl(host, STATUS);
> >> +          if (!(status & SDMMC_DATA_BUSY))
> >> +                  break;
> >> +          ctrl = mci_readl(host, CTRL);
> >> +          ctrl |= SDMMC_CTRL_RESET;
> >> +          mci_writel(host, CTRL, ctrl);
> >> +  } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> >> +
> >> +  mci_send_cmd(slot, SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> >>  {
> >>    struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> >> @@ -650,15 +668,13 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot 
> >> *slot)
> > According to your quotation of manual("Before disabling clock, ...),
> > Place of dw_mci_inform_ciu is proper here?
> manual is mentioned "before the disabling clock". but i think no problem 
> before send the command.
> >
> >     dw_mci_inform_ciu(slot);
> >
> >           /* disable clock */
> >          mci_writel(host, CLKENA, 0);
> >          mci_writel(host, CLKSRC, 0);
> >
> >>            mci_writel(host, CLKSRC, 0);
> >>
> >>            /* inform CIU */
> >> -          mci_send_cmd(slot,
> >> -                       SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> >> +          dw_mci_inform_ciu(slot);
> >>
> >>            /* set clock to desired speed */
> >>            mci_writel(host, CLKDIV, div);
> >>
> >>            /* inform CIU */
> >> -          mci_send_cmd(slot,
> >> -                       SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> >> +          dw_mci_inform_ciu(slot);
> > And then, since start to change clock sequence, there is no need to check 
> > busy-status.
> > Just need to update clock with origin code.
> Right, didn't check the busy-status. but there is also no reason that didn't 
> need to check busy-status.
Ok, I mentioned no check busy-status because host doesn't send command to card 
in the middle of host's clock update.
If you have a opinion, please let me know.

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon

> >>
> >>            /* enable clock; only low power if no SDIO */
> >>            clk_en_a = SDMMC_CLKEN_ENABLE << slot->id;
> >> @@ -667,8 +683,7 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> >>            mci_writel(host, CLKENA, clk_en_a);
> >>
> >>            /* inform CIU */
> >> -          mci_send_cmd(slot,
> >> -                       SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> >> +          dw_mci_inform_ciu(slot);
> > Same here.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Seungwon Jeon
> >>
> >>            host->current_speed = slot->clock;
> >>    }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> >> index 15c27e1..b6a1a78 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> >> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@
> >>  #define SDMMC_CMD_INDX(n)         ((n) & 0x1F)
> >>  /* Status register defines */
> >>  #define SDMMC_GET_FCNT(x)         (((x)>>17) & 0x1FFF)
> >> +#define SDMMC_DATA_BUSY                   BIT(9)
> >>  /* Internal DMAC interrupt defines */
> >>  #define SDMMC_IDMAC_INT_AI                BIT(9)
> >>  #define SDMMC_IDMAC_INT_NI                BIT(8)
> >> --
> >> 1.7.4.1
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> > the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to