Hi,

On Fri, Oct 26 2012, Johan Rudholm wrote:
> 2012/10/26 Philip Rakity <[email protected]>:
>>
>> On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Johan Rudholm
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +     default:
>>> +             str = "invalid";
>>
>> would "is unknown"  be a better str ?
>
> Maybe... Actually, I just followed the standard in the function, all
> other strings default to "invalid" when the definition is missing. So
> if I change this, then I should also change the rest of the strings in
> the function. I will do this if we think it's worth the effort, but is
> it?

Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.8 -- let's handle string renaming
separately to this patch.

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <[email protected]>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to