On 03/06/2013 03:54 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 06 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 02/20/2013 11:35 AM, Rhyland Klein wrote: >>> The structs wrapped with the SOC ifdefs are small enough where having >>> them always there shouldn't be a big overhead. Removing the ifdefs >>> also makes the code a little cleaner. >> >> I think patches 3 and 4 of this series can go through either the MMC >> tree (I checked there are no conflicts with the MMC patch I have to take >> through the Tegra tree), or the Tegra tree (since I'm taking another >> Tegra MMC patch though there), both without any dependency issues. >> >> It's your call. Let me know if you want me to take them through the >> Tegra tree with an ack. Or, if you want to take them through the MMC >> tree that's fine too. If you need them reposted to see the content, let >> me know, or they're at: > > Via the MMC tree with an ack sounds good
OK, thanks. Patches 3/4 and 4/4, Acked-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
