Hi Ulf,
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Instead of having a local hack taking care of sending the tuning
> command and as well to verify the response pattern, let's convert to
> the common mmc_send_tuning() API.
>
> This change affects the Exynos variant, since it's the only one which
> support the dw_mmc's ->execute_tuning() callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> ---
>
With this change HS200 mode does not work on exynos5800 peach-pi board.
I got below error while testing this series:
mmc0: tuning execution failed
mmc0: error -5 whilst initialising MMC card
Though, your's next branch with commit _a1d06b4_ works fine in HS200 mode.
> Changes in v2:
> Rebased, to get latest version of the mmc_send_tuning() API.
>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 49
> ++++------------------------------------
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 22 +-----------------
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 8 +------
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> index 509365c..d0d7aec 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> @@ -375,64 +375,24 @@ out:
> return loc;
> }
>
> -static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode,
> - struct dw_mci_tuning_data
> *tuning_data)
> +static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> {
> struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc;
> - const u8 *blk_pattern = tuning_data->blk_pattern;
> - u8 *blk_test;
> - unsigned int blksz = tuning_data->blksz;
> u8 start_smpl, smpl, candiates = 0;
> s8 found = -1;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - blk_test = kmalloc(blksz, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!blk_test)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> start_smpl = dw_mci_exynos_get_clksmpl(host);
>
> do {
> - struct mmc_request mrq = {NULL};
> - struct mmc_command cmd = {0};
> - struct mmc_command stop = {0};
> - struct mmc_data data = {0};
> - struct scatterlist sg;
> -
> - cmd.opcode = opcode;
> - cmd.arg = 0;
> - cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_ADTC;
> -
> - stop.opcode = MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION;
> - stop.arg = 0;
> - stop.flags = MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
> -
> - data.blksz = blksz;
> - data.blocks = 1;
> - data.flags = MMC_DATA_READ;
> - data.sg = &sg;
> - data.sg_len = 1;
> -
> - sg_init_one(&sg, blk_test, blksz);
> - mrq.cmd = &cmd;
> - mrq.stop = &stop;
> - mrq.data = &data;
> - host->mrq = &mrq;
> -
> mci_writel(host, TMOUT, ~0);
> smpl = dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(host);
>
> - mmc_wait_for_req(mmc, &mrq);
> + ret = mmc_send_tuning(mmc);
> + if (!ret)
> + candiates |= (1 << smpl);
>
> - if (!cmd.error && !data.error) {
> - if (!memcmp(blk_pattern, blk_test, blksz))
> - candiates |= (1 << smpl);
> - } else {
> - dev_dbg(host->dev,
> - "Tuning error: cmd.error:%d, data.error:%d\n",
> - cmd.error, data.error);
> - }
> } while (start_smpl != smpl);
>
> found = dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(candiates);
> @@ -441,7 +401,6 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct
> dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode,
> else
> ret = -EIO;
>
> - kfree(blk_test);
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 67c0451..265bb28 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -1299,30 +1299,10 @@ static int dw_mci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host
> *mmc, u32 opcode)
> struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
> struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> const struct dw_mci_drv_data *drv_data = host->drv_data;
> - struct dw_mci_tuning_data tuning_data;
> int err = -ENOSYS;
>
> - if (opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200) {
> - if (mmc->ios.bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8) {
> - tuning_data.blk_pattern = tuning_blk_pattern_8bit;
> - tuning_data.blksz = sizeof(tuning_blk_pattern_8bit);
> - } else if (mmc->ios.bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4) {
> - tuning_data.blk_pattern = tuning_blk_pattern_4bit;
> - tuning_data.blksz = sizeof(tuning_blk_pattern_4bit);
> - } else {
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> - } else if (opcode == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK) {
> - tuning_data.blk_pattern = tuning_blk_pattern_4bit;
> - tuning_data.blksz = sizeof(tuning_blk_pattern_4bit);
> - } else {
> - dev_err(host->dev,
> - "Undefined command(%d) for tuning\n", opcode);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> if (drv_data && drv_data->execute_tuning)
> - err = drv_data->execute_tuning(slot, opcode, &tuning_data);
> + err = drv_data->execute_tuning(slot);
> return err;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> index 0d0f7a2..c1f4557 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
> @@ -248,11 +248,6 @@ struct dw_mci_slot {
> int sdio_id;
> };
>
> -struct dw_mci_tuning_data {
> - const u8 *blk_pattern;
> - unsigned int blksz;
> -};
> -
> /**
> * dw_mci driver data - dw-mshc implementation specific driver data.
> * @caps: mmc subsystem specified capabilities of the controller(s).
> @@ -274,7 +269,6 @@ struct dw_mci_drv_data {
> void (*prepare_command)(struct dw_mci *host, u32 *cmdr);
> void (*set_ios)(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios);
> int (*parse_dt)(struct dw_mci *host);
> - int (*execute_tuning)(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32
> opcode,
> - struct dw_mci_tuning_data
> *tuning_data);
> + int (*execute_tuning)(struct dw_mci_slot *slot);
> };
> #endif /* _DW_MMC_H_ */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Regards,
Alim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
