On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:33:10AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 5 March 2015 at 08:11, Kuninori Morimoto > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Ulf > > > >> > Hi Ulf, Vinod, Simon > >> > > >> > DMAEngine cleanup patches are accepted in v4.0-rc1 > >> > > >> > As I mentioned in > >> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/42669 > >> > these are last of sh_mobile_sdhi DMA patches. > >> > > >> > These patches uses tmio_mmc_data on platform, > >> > and remove sh_mobile_sdhi > >> > > >> > These are based on > >> > - linus's v4.0-rc1 > >> > - Vinod's dma/next (git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git > >> > :: next) > >> > > >> > Vinod > >> > > >> > please let us know if it has stable tag or branch No my next is not stable, I will rebase that. I think you want to pick topic/sh, that is an immutable branch Can you check that has all the patches you need for this?
> >> Please use topic/sh. I will not rebase that, my next would be rebased > >> frequently... > > > > Please let me know if you want me to re-send these patches > > I have no issues with the patches as such. Though, I wonder about the > dependency here. > > Does these patches depend on an immutable branch hosted from Vinod's tree? > > > Do you want me to take the patches through my mmc tree or just request > an ack so Vinod can carry this? Either ways is okay with me.. -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
