On 16 October 2015 at 09:44, Yangbo Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
> The eSDHC doesn't have a standard power control register, so when
> writing this register in stack we should do nothing to avoid
> incorrect operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu <[email protected]>

Thanks, applied for next.

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c 
> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> index 7b9282b..90e94a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,12 @@ static u32 esdhc_writeb_fixup(struct sdhci_host *host,
>         int shift = (spec_reg & 0x3) * 8;
>
>         /*
> +        * eSDHC doesn't have a standard power control register, so we do
> +        * nothing here to avoid incorrect operation.
> +        */
> +       if (spec_reg == SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL)
> +               return old_value;
> +       /*
>          * "DMA select" location is offset 0x28 in SD specification, but on
>          * P5020 or P3041, it's located at 0x29.
>          */
> --
> 2.1.0.27.g96db324
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to