Greg,

As you probably already know, the VirusScan dat files from McAfee (Nai) 
are updated weekly.  Hopefully I was not too confusing.  I was speaking 
of 2 different products.

Harry


Greg Conway wrote:
> 
> Hi Harry,
> 
> Thanks for this, it looks interesting. Might well be where the rest of my
> night goes.... :)
> 
> But - the reason I have arrived at this juncture, is as follows...
> 
> I have been happily setting up Linux Servers using something called Inflex
> (a Linux mail scanner), using F-PROT, a free (for non-commercial use and
> cheap for commercial use!) Linux virus scanner.
> 
> All was going well, until last week one of my sites was infected by a new
> virus!
> 
> This appeared to be down to the date of the updates. Using Symantec NAV2002,
> new definitions are released daily, and in four years of using NAV for
> Windows, I've not been caught by a virus whilst NAV was installed and
> enabled!!
> 
> So, putting two and two together, and allowing for the fact that Symantec
> don't produce NAV for Linux, I decided to put together a scanner out of the
> DOS versions of NAV... which explains where I am now!
> 
> So, whilst F-PROT and now it appears Panda are free in some cases, there is
> obviously a price to pay for this... this appearing to be the rate new
> defintions are released at!
> 
> So, like I said, I'll examine Panda, and I'll also continue to use F-PROT,
> but what I'd like to do is add my trusted NAV into the equation.... all
> working under Linux, just not returning the correct errorlevel!
> 
> So, many thanks, but my quest continues - if anybody has any further ideas
> they'd be much appreciated!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Greg.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > H. B.
> > Sent: 29 April 2002 22:55
> > To: Greg Conway
> > Subject: Re: DOS errorlevel not working?
> >
> >
> > Greg,
> >
> > The corporate version of VirusScan contains VirusScan for
> > Linux (command line).  Panda Software has a free Linux
> > version, but I have not used it.  I've only used VirusScan.
> >
> > http://www.nai.com/naicommon/buy-try/try/products-evals.asp#McAfee
> > http://www.pandasoftware.com/com/linux/linux.asp
> >
> > Keep in mind that I do not use this software for Linux,
> > but to scan my Windows drives from Linux.
> >
> > Harry
> >
> > Greg Conway wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've just found DOSEMU yesterday, when I discovered I needed X
> > windows to
> > > run WINE!
> > >
> > > I am trying to get the Norton Anti-Virus Scanner NAVDX.EXE working under
> > > Linux. This is all fine, I've managed to get the
> > > thing working, and mount the folder I wish to scan as my D:
> > drive (has taken
> > > me some time but there was documentation for all this on the web!!)
> > >
> > > However, I'm having trouble with the errorlevel command, and
> > returning the
> > > result to Linux. Consider the following DOS program:
> > >
> > > @echo off
> > > c:\navdx\navdx.exe c:\virusfolder /s+ /doallfiles /zips /delete
> > > if errorlevel 13 echo "virus"
> > > if errorlevel 0 echo "clear"
> > >
> > > simple stuff. Under Win2K, this program does the decent thing
> > and returns
> > > "virus" and "clear", as expected (DOS errorlevel command
> > reports >= rather
> > > then = if I remember correctly!), if I drop the EICAR test
> > files into the
> > > directory c:\virusfolder.
> > >
> > > However, under DOSEMU (I'm running the binaries with FreeDOS) it returns
> > > errorlevel 0 every time.
> > >
> > > Any ideas what could be going wrong here? I'm pulling my hair
> > out over this,
> > > and have been scouring the web for examples all day with no success!!
> > >
> > > Once I have this sorted, my final problem will be to return the
> > errorlevel
> > > to Linux, where I've called DOSEMU from a shell
> > > script, so if anybody has any ideas on this as well they'd be gratefully
> > > received - the best I've found is a posting so far
> > > that says "how does it work? exitemu 1 doesn't do the job"!!)
> > >
> > > Many thanks for any help received.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Greg Conway.
> > >
> > > (apologies if this is duplicated, my first post does not appear to have
> > > arrived!
> > >
> > > ***********************************************************************
> > > This is a confidential communication between sender and
> > addressee. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
> > please notify the sender and do not read, copy, use or disclose
> > this communication to others. Any opinions or views expressed are
> > those of the individual, and unless otherwise stated, are not
> > those of the company. All attachments and intellectual rights
> > remain the property of GML (NT) Limited.
> > > ***********************************************************************
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-msdos" in
> > > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 
> ***********************************************************************
> This is a confidential communication between sender and addressee. If you are not 
>the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender and do not read, 
>copy, use or disclose this communication to others. Any opinions or views expressed 
>are those of the individual, and unless otherwise stated, are not those of the 
>company. All attachments and intellectual rights remain the property of GML (NT) 
>Limited.
> ***********************************************************************
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to