Hello. Bart Oldeman wrote: >> Isn't 1.0.2.1 the latest 'stable' version, >> whilst 1.1.3 is unstable' ? > Yes. Well, no:) Consider this: 1.0.2.1 had enough *known* bugs for too long. Version that have known bugs (in contrast to unknown, which are always present) can't be called "stable" or recommended for a real use IMO, esp. when such bugs are many and some are serious.
> It's basically like this: > if 1.0.2.1 works for you then stick with it. That's true but atleast every person must be aware that this version have *known* bugs and there is another version which doesn't have atleast those. This is what most people not even suspect (but for the readers of this list it is strange:) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
