>>>>> Stas Sergeev writes:
Stas> Yes, I understand that this error means a missing
Stas> definition. What am I trying to say is that it looks like a bug
Stas> of a particular glibc version, so that no modifications to
Stas> dosemu required at all, just "upgrade your glibc" message.
Wow! :) That's sort of using a steam-hammer to crack nuts.
Stas> We can always hardcode that size to 4, but what if midid will
Stas> use IPv6 one day? :) Could you, btw, please search for that
Stas> definition in the other headers?
Nothing.
Stas> I can't beleive it can be simply missing, after reading "man
Stas> inet".
I read it too. And saw just unsigned long int :) System is
Debian 2.2 (Potato)
Stas> It would be the best to add an in_addr_t check to configure and
Stas> define it ourselves if it is missing, but probably this is just
Stas> too much for such a small thing:)
:) Well, 1.1.4 is a development release. I think when 1.2 is
out glibc will be 5.x ;)
--
Sergey Suleymanov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
