On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 02:51:56PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > > +                      seg >= current->active_mm->context.ldt->size)) {
> > 
> > ldt->size is the size of the descriptor table but you've shifted seg by
> > 3. That selector index is shifted by 3 (to the left) to form an offset
> > into the descriptor table because the entries there are 8 bytes.
> I double-checked the ldt code and it seems to me that size refers to the
> number of entries in the table; it is always multiplied by
> LDT_ENTRY_SIZE [1], [2]. Am I missing something?

No, you're not. I fell into that wrongly named struct member trap.

So ldt_struct.size should actually be called ldt_struct.n_entries or
similar. Because what's in there is now is not "size".

And then code like

        new_ldt->size * LDT_ENTRY_SIZE

would make much more sense if written like this:

        new_ldt->n_entries * LDT_ENTRY_SIZE

Would you fix that in a prepatch pls?



SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imend├Ârffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 
(AG N├╝rnberg)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to