On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 18:37 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:17:05AM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > We are not in a critical failure path. The invalid register type is caused
> > when trying to decode invalid instruction bytes from a user-space program.
> > Thus, simply print an error message. To prevent this warning from being
> > abused from user space programs, use the rate-limited variant of printk.
> >
> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>
> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbin...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoa...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei....@intel.com>
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgar...@google.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com>
> > Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shan...@intel.com>
> > Cc: x...@kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calde...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> > index e746a6f..182e2ae 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > */
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/string.h>
> > +#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> > #include <asm/inat.h>
> > #include <asm/insn.h>
> > #include <asm/insn-eval.h>
> > @@ -85,9 +86,8 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct
> > pt_regs *regs,
> > break;
> >
> > default:
> > - pr_err("invalid register type");
> > - BUG();
> > - break;
> > + printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "insn-eval: x86: invalid register
> > type");
>
> You can use pr_err_ratelimited() and define "insn-eval" with pr_fmt.
> Look for examples in the tree.
Will do. I have looked at the examples.
>
> Btw, "insn-eval" is perhaps not the right name - since we're building
> an instruction decoder, maybe it should be called "insn-dec" or so. I'm
> looking at those other arch/x86/lib/insn.c, arch/x86/include/asm/inat.h
> things and how they're starting to morph into one decoding facility,
> AFAICT.
I agree that insn-eval reads somewhat funny. I did not want to go with
insn-dec.c as insn.c, in my opinion, already decodes the instruction
(i.e., it finds prefixes, opcodes, ModRM, SIB and displacement bytes).
In insn-eval.c I simply take those decoded parameters and evaluate them
to obtain the values they contain (e.g., a specific memory location).
Perhaps, insn-resolve.c could be a better name? Or maybe isnn-operands?
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
