On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 10:24 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The first question about sysfs related patches is always, does the following
> work:
>
> (sleep 120; cat /sys/some/device/file) &
> rmmod thedevicemodule
>
> You need to make sure that all kobjects are correctly reference counted and
> that the free is done by the kernel subsystem not the device.
I can't try your test right now (I happend to disable module unloading)
but isn't this
+static void atm_release(struct class_device *cdev)
+{
+ struct atm_dev *adev = class_get_devdata(cdev);
+
+ kfree(adev);
+}
+
+static struct class atm_class = {
+ .name = "atm",
+ .release = atm_release,
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
+ .hotplug = atm_hotplug,
+#endif
+};
and this
+static void release_atm_dev(struct atm_dev *dev)
+{
+ /* will free via class release */
+ class_device_put(&dev->class_dev);
+}
+
...
@@ -129,6 +146,8 @@ void atm_dev_deregister(struct atm_dev *
{
unsigned long warning_time;
+ atm_unregister_sysfs(dev);
+
atm_proc_dev_deregister(dev);
spin_lock(&atm_dev_lock);
@@ -147,7 +166,7 @@ void atm_dev_deregister(struct atm_dev *
}
}
- __free_atm_dev(dev);
+ release_atm_dev(dev);
}
not sufficient? Besides, it seems to behave with the similar test but
with unplugging the modem instead of rmmoding the driver.
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
