Dear Mircea,

On 26-Jan-99 Mircea Ciocan wrote:
>       The BAD news is that with your setup you can NOT have roaming
> capabilities, because for roaming you must have the AP0 and AP1 coverage
> area overlapped with the same ESSID and diferent hopping sequence and
> the SA0 will associate with the closest AP and only if you can isolate
> somehow the SA0 input from AP0 frames by using VERY directional antena
> so the SA0 will associate ONLY with AP1 this setup will work. We tryed
> that but because of area overlaping and reflections it was not reliable,
> somehow the SA0 will allways associate with AP0 after some time and
> goodbye link between cells :(. So we take the safe road and use an extra
> AP for the link, giving him and SA different ESSID and HOPS, like the
> book said ;). This works perfectly AND gives you the seamingless roaming
> for those nice users ;)

Hmmm, did you also experiance this problem with the new PRO.11 models?
The "SA PRO.11" has a configuration option that is called prevered AP.
There you can type in HW Address of your prevered AP that you whana assosiate.
I was hoping that this might do the trick without the extra AP.

>       P.S. I use this beasts for about 2 yrs, from the first models that
> appeared before the standard was finshed. So if have a need for help I'm
> available for a short contract relocation ;). 

Nice idea. Might be not a too bad idea.
I have also used Linux for now almost 5 years. Did also quite a fare bit of
kernel programming with v4l for some specialized Framegrabber cards. However,
I'm new to this routing and rouming business. Maybe if I'm stuck then this
might be a nice option. You would have to remotely resolve problems on my
site...
Yop, I'm thinking about it.


Georg

>> 
>>     \ | /                                           \ | /
>>   +-------+                    +------+ /         +-------+
>>   | AP 0  |                 +--+ SA 0 | -         | AP 1  |
>>   +---+---+                 |  +------+ \         +---+---+
>>       |                     |                         |
>>       |   +--------------+  |                         |
>>       |   | Linux Box    |  |                         |
>>       +---+ eth0    eth1 +--+                         +--->
>>           +--------------+
>> 
>> Here, the SA0 together with the Linux Box should act like a wireless bridge.
>> I could use the LBox as a router with static path, that will definitively
>> work.
>> But that way I don't have any roaming capabilities.
>> Hence, I'm wondering if anybody has tried this.
>> 
>> Looking forward to get some input.
>> 
>> Georg Israel
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



----------------------------------------------------------
Georg P. Israel      Phone: +41-1-632 4583
ETH - IBT            Fax:   +41-1-632 1193
ETZ K61
Gloriastr. 35        mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
8092 Zuerich         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SWITZERLAND          http://zaphod.ethz.ch
                     http://zaphod.ethz.ch/linux/kernel-2.2
-----------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to