Geez! Let it go! I'd rather get the "bandwidth wasting SIG" then pointless "debate" e-mails which basically equate to spam in my mail box. Besides, I see more bandwidth wasted by reply-quoting the entire previous message (see below) then in the SIG. ---------- From: Franklin Black Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 12:28 PM To: LKLawson; 'LINUX-NE@SMTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'; 'LINUX-DI@SMTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'; 'LINUX-AD@SMTP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' Subject: Re: let's save traffic for important thi Original Subject: Re: let's save traffic for important things. ..And by sending your message, you created even more traffic. Good going, man! ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Denis Voitenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Linux Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Linux Diald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Linux Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: let's save traffic for important things. Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 16:03:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 06 21:11:07 1999 Received: from [128.214.248.27] by hotmail.com (1.5) with SMTP id MHotMailB8FBB2D600C3D1B9832B80D6F81B0C580; Thu May 06 21:11:07 1999 Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2]:7281 "EHLO vger.rutgers.edu" ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]") by listserv.funet.fi with ESMTP id <13994-16526>; Fri, 7 May 1999 07:06:00 +0300 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id <156714-31805>; Thu, 6 May 1999 22:00:12 -0400 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <156853-31807>; Thu, 6 May 1999 19:05:50 -0400 Received: from [209.0.233.22] ([209.0.233.22]:56546 "HELO l3serv10.netzero.net" ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]") by vger.rutgers.edu with SMTP id <157023-31807>; Thu, 6 May 1999 15:22:42 -0400 Received: (qmail 6968 invoked by uid 0); 6 May 1999 20:02:18 -0000 Received: from dialup-209.244.80.232.philadelphia1.level3.net (HELO denis) (209.244.80.232) by mail.netzero.net with SMTP; 6 May 1999 20:02:18 -0000 Message-ID: <001a01be97fb$79606ae0$e850f4d1@denis> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-net-outgoing Below is the perfect example of what one's signature should not be like. C'mon. Consider the others. Your signature actually adds traffic. _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ Exxon Research & Engineering _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/ Kevin K. Sochacki _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ ICSBS CC124 (908) 730-2911 _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ & _/_/_/ _/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ PERSONAL _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/ http://mars.superlink.net/kks _/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ________________________________________________________ NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you? Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -====---====---====---====---====---====---====---====---====---====---====- to unsubscribe email "unsubscribe linux-admin" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] See the linux-admin FAQ: http://www.kalug.lug.net/linux-admin-FAQ/
