In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > Q: Any chance of changing the firewall send a TCP RST instead of ICMP > > dest. unreachable? > > I strongly suspect Paul already does it in netfilter. 8)8)8) No I don't. See, Alexey, I do listen sometimes 8). ipfilter can send RSTs. Someone can write a netfilter/iptables extention to send RSTs. I won't be doing it by default though. Rusty. -- Tridge, Raster, DaveM, Cort, maddog... Where will you be 9-11 July 1999? http://www.linux.org.au/projects/calu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Tim Fletcher
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... kuznet
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* st... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Taral
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of T... Paul Rusty Russell
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: ICMP dest-unreach in SYN_* states of TCP Bernd Eckenfels