-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Shouldn't the IP address be something that is lookable like 192.168.1.x
??? Why did you use 192.168.0.x ??? I thought 192.168.0.x was supposed
to
be a loopback? Can you ping 192.168.0.x from another machine in the
LAN???
Cheers!
Moonshi Mohsenruddin
Member, Linux Users Group Singapore
Editor, Singapore Linux Portal
************************************
Mobile: +(65) 97452310 ICQ: 2595480
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.s-one.net.sg
LiNUX, ... the choice of a
GNU generation ...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trenton D. Adams
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 3:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Samba Not showing in network
>
>
> Yes I do.
> I have gotten samba to become the master browser on subnet
> 127.0.0.1. At
> least this is what the log file says. What can I do to make
> it do it for
> 192.168.0.x?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: August 4, 1999 8:19 PM
> To: Trenton D. Adams
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Samba Not showing in network
>
>
> Do you have both TCP/IP bound to the card in the Windows machine? You
> don't need it for a WIn <-> Win network, but Samba requires it.
>
> HTH
>
> On Tue, 3 Aug 1999 23:12:03 -0600, you wrote:
>
> >I have Red Hat Linux 6.0, and Windows 98 Second Edition. I
> can't see the
> >samba server, what can I possibly check?
> >
> >Here are a few details that may be relevant.
> >
> >I am running dhcpd with the following configuration
> >My internet DNS servers (should I setup a LAN DNS?)
> >Gateway = 192.168.0.1
> >Subnet Mask = 255.255.255.0
> >DHCP Server = 192.168.0.1
> >No Wins server
> >
> >
> >I am running smbd and nmbd.
> >
> >I just looked at the nmbd log, and it says that Packet send failed to
> >192.168.0.255. I believe nmbd was trying to tell my network
> that the linux
> >box was there, and what it's name was (???).
> >
> >I did an Upgrade to Linux 6.0. Is it possible that the
> upgrade didn't
> >upgrade nmb, and smb properly?
> >
> >I can't think of anything else that may be relevant at the moment.
> >p.s.
> >I have never ever gotten samba to show on the network on any
> linux machine
> >before!
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-net" in
> >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -chrome
> ---
> "Victims, aren't we all?" - The Crow
> http://www.heckman.net/chrome for codes & keys.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-net" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i
iQA/AwUBN6j5jWefe0TVuy5lEQKgCwCfTjHr88h3nhQbhg9axlWZg9MNhWcAnRZM
Syw+uklTChPeVT/r7NVzvwdz
=5Y13
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
