Beau Kuiper wrote: > 1) Better security: There arn't many things running on a router to go wrong and > to let people in (although they are not invulnerable). LRP can be admin via ssh. Enough said. > 2) Better reliabilty: Routers have no hard drives AFAIK or other PC > components that could unexpectedly fail. If it does acutally fail, just unplug > it and replace it. PCs tend to need long configuration phases. You've never even tried LRP have you? For shame! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Router Supported by linux Dave Cinege
- Re: Router Supported by linux Dave Cinege
- Re: Router Supported by linux David Ford
- Re: Router Supported by linux Alan Cox
- Re: Router Supported by linux Beau Kuiper
- Re: Router Supported by linux Erik Andersen
- Re: Router Supported by linux Bruce Stephens
- Re: Router Supported by linux Alan Cox
- Re: Router Supported by linux Harry McGregor
- Re: Router Supported by linux Michelle Konzack
- Re: Router Supported by linux Dave Cinege
- Re: Router Supported by linux Mathias Feiler
- Re: Router Supported by linux Dennis
- Re: Router Supported by linux Robert G. Fisher
- Re: Router Supported by linux Dan Hollis
- Re: Router Supported by linux Robert G. Fisher
- Re: Router Supported by linux Dan Hollis
- Re: Router Supported by linux Harry McGregor
- Re: Router Supported by linux Jeff Mcadams
- Re: Router Supported by linux Harry McGregor
- Re: Router Supported by linux Scott Laird
