([ On 26 Nov 99, one witty mortal did share some wisdom... ])
Hehe, a thread I can actually reply to ;o)
> > for (i=0; i<3; i++)
> And what about the line below ...
> - for(j=0; j<3; j++);{
> + for(j=0; j<3; j++){
> is this correct ...
Yes, it is. The semi-colon after the 2nd for loop...
ie " for( j = 0; j < 3; j++);{ "
...will actually make it skip everything after the for command, ie the
loop won't run.
Simply removing the offending semi-colon should solve many
problems IMO :o)
Would it also be feasible to add a 2nd set of {} to the first for loop ?
It may not be necessary, and it may confuse some people, but
personally, I add {} to each for loop :o)
Which ever you find easiest to work with though...
Ard Righ
S' Rioghal Mo Dhream!
([XXH<>%<>HXX])=============================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
