Hello,
        Thank you once again.
        I remember I once used nediag or something similar by D.Becker.
        Will this be of any help? Where can I get it from?

> Look at the error statistics on the ethernet devices
> ifconfig eth0
> If there are error counts there interpert...

I'm sorry, I don't know how to interpret this. Here it goes.
This is what I get on PC1 after some pinging to PC4:

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:80:AD:19:55:4D  
          inet addr:192.168.1.1  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:634 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1
          TX packets:203 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 
          Interrupt:5 Base address:0x300 

This is what I get on PC4 after pinging PC1. No receiving errors but very
high Tx error rate and collisions, and not usual base address:

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:C0:DF:F3:BC:C4  
          inet addr:192.168.1.4  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:130 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:135 errors:117 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:117
          collisions:1989 txqueuelen:100 
          Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe800 


> >>If you can get a ping at all, your software is working. Sounds like you
> >>have some dodgy ethernet wiring and perhaps poor connections.
> >>Regards,
> >>Bruce.
> >
> >Ok. But is it possible to ping from PC1 to PC4 with reasonable delay and no
> >loos while the other way round reports up to 40000ms rtt and 95% loss?
> >
> >>>Hello,
> >>>   I have 4 PCs on an ethernet:
> >>>
> >>>   PC1 192.168.1.1 running Redhat 6.0
> >>>   PC2 192.168.1.2 running Rehhat 6.2
> >>>   PC3 192.168.1.3 running Win98
> >>>   PC4 192.168.1.4 running Redhat 6.2
> >>>
> >>>   PCs 1 and 3 can ping everybody PC with 0% loss and avg rtt 0.5ms
> >>>   PCs 2 and 4 get aprox 95% loss when pinging enybody, even
> >>>           themselves, even with just the T and two line terminators
> >>>           (50 ohm).
> >>>
> >>>   Is redhat 6.2 just a coincidence or am I ignoring a known bug?
> >>>   lsmod gives ne2k-pci and 8390 on redhat 6.2
> >>>   lsmod gives ne and 8390 on redhat 6.0
> >>>
> >>>Please, HELP!
> >>>Thank you,
> >>>
> >>>Mat�as.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to