-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Jos Lemmerling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, DEMERRE DIETER wrote: > > > So indeed, I cannot see what could be the problem, but is > it possible > > that the .2 machine runs on 100 and the two others on 10 Mb ? or > > the inverse ? > > If not, I can't discover the flaw > > > > Somebody ever told me NOT to use ip-addresses with zero's in it, > because it could cause strange errors etc. > I don't know if it's true, but i'm sure someone will correct me if > it's not. I'm pretty sure that somebody ment that finishing zero's are unacceptable, since these are the adresses of the network. So e.g. from experience I know that if you do ping 123.45.67.0, in theory all machines on that subnet could reply, in practice, certainly Linux Redhat 4.2 (i486) AND Mac PowerPC System 7.4 do reply, don't know anymore what about M$. But there's no harm in using 192.168.0.1 etc. as ip-adress. I even think that that adress is used pretty often. ******* Groetjes vanwege ***** Greetings From ******* Dieter Demerre - http://www.angelfire.com/de/ddemerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOWl4NAlG34XnM6kpEQJN9ACgmKJkU7Ma7gBfjVBbG/g+fnHtcLsAoPhD RVujWmmn2LV7Wd4KvtbkpqaY =04Fu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
