Linux-Networking Digest #798, Volume #9 Wed, 6 Jan 99 16:13:46 EST
Contents:
Re: ADSL (Richard Steiner)
Re: RedHat 5.2 and pcmcia question? (Job eisses)
Re: Dial-on-demand works, now make it stop! ("Marc D. Behr")
Re: Automatically cut ppp link ("Marc D. Behr")
Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (Kevin Martin)
Linux better than NT 4.0 for file and print? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DirecPC ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PPP Dial-Up Access S L O W! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: US modem in UK machine says "NO DIAL TONE" (Chris Rankin)
Re: Dropped RX Packets on Interface ppp0 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Name Resolution (Daniel Zanatta)
Re: Help with traffic shaper ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Telnet as root ("George Csahanin")
Re: Problem building C-Kermit on Linux (Redhat) 5.2 (Frank da Cruz)
Re: How to use 2 DNS servers ? (Barry Margolin)
Re: How to serve two domains ? ("Jay D Ribak")
Re: IP connection ("George Csahanin")
Re: pppd error message (Clifford Kite)
Two ip addresses on one NIC ("Andrew Ip")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: ADSL
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 22:24:04 -0600
Here in comp.os.linux.networking, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake unto us, saying:
>I have selected an ISP which provides ADSL service, and am scheduled
>to be hooked up with US West at the end of the month. Have not run
>across any documentation or pointers to drivers at this point.
No drivers required -- your modem (a Cisco 675) will be connected to
a NIC in your box using a 10BaseT crossover cable, assuming you chose
the external RADSL modem anyway.
>I do not receive the 'modem' from them for another 3 weeks, but I
>would be interested in hearing from anyone who has set up this service.
Well... It's a *LOT* faster than my Courier was! :-) :-)
I see you've already been given the URL to the FAQ, so I won't post it.
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
What part of "OS/2 RULES!" do you not understand? :-)
------------------------------
From: Job eisses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.2 and pcmcia question?
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 01:23:50 +0100
Michael Kalisz wrote:
>
> Hello everyone
>
> Does RedHat 5.2 support switching IP configuration using
> the cardctl scheme??
>
> Until now I've been running the SuSE distribution but wanted
> to try RedHat for a change. I discovered that RedHat uses
> a different setup for the pcmcia configuration then the
> one described in the PCMCIA-Howto.
>
> The "usual" is to have the configurations in /etc/pcmcia/network.opts
> so you can switch IP-configuration with cardctl.
> (Very handy, with only one file to edit)
>
> But the RedHat distribution seems to use the files
> in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts instead.
>
> I use a lot of different IP configurations(Home,work...)
> and would like a "simple" way to be able to switch between
> those configurations at any time.
>
> Should I install the "standard" pcmcia distributions setup files?
> Or can linuxconf accomplish this task?
I don't run RH5.2 yet (4.2 now), but also often use different IP
configurations.
I changed pcmcia software a few times, and like the /etc/pcmcia way
of doing things. My laptop is booted with loadlin, from a config.sys
menu with the linux ip configs most often used, all they do is give a
parameter "iparam=xyz" on the loadlin. In linux the parameter is used
to copy the desired network.opts and hosts files to /etc/pcmcia and
/etc before cardmgr is started, as soon as linux is up it runs ok.
Another shell script changes the same files and runs "cardctl eject;
cardctl insert" for runtime changes, but depending how involved the
networking (DNS, NFS, NIS,..) was this sometimes fails.
I doubt if RH5.2 can used as flexibly -job
------------------------------
From: "Marc D. Behr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dial-on-demand works, now make it stop!
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 13:00:11 -0500
Tim Costello wrote:
>
> I'm running Redhat 5.0, to which I've added pppd-2.3.5, including the
> re-edit of ppp.c and a kernel recompile. Works, fine with ipmasq, and
> 2-3 Win95 boxes behind it. Except, it dials-out, even when there isn't
> a demand. Some of this might be due to the Win boxes and nice clean
> (it's a joke, son) networking. But some of it corresponds to events on
> the Linux system itself. For instance, syslog rotation and a dial-out
> event correspond in the logs.
>
> This brings up 2 questions:
>
> 1) How do I determine what's causing the dial-out? I assumed I do it
> with tcpdump, but I'm not capturing anything watching the ppp0 device,
> so I must be missing something.
>
The most likely culprit is DNS. One of the internal systems is
requesting a an IP address and the DNS server needs to go out for it.
If you watch the internal interface for packets destined for the gateway
you might catch the reason.
> 2) If and when I determine which packets are starting the link, how do I
> stop them? I expected that I might be able to use filter definitions to
> have the dialer ignore certain packets, similar to what can be done with
> Ascend routers, but the man page for pppd indicates that function is
> only available with NetBSD, why? Using IPmasq to stop them is too
> severe, there might be certain traffic you'd want to pass during a live
> session, but not want them to bring up a connection (like many Msoft
> Netbios over TCP packets...)
This is harder. I too have noticed that the filtering is only available
on BSD boxes which is frustrating since my link stays up as people try
to access port 13223/udp all day long. I wish that I could filter that
crap out of keeping the link alive.
Marc
--
Marc D. Behr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key ID: 0x1F1920BC
Fingerprint20 = 7DC2 3B63 EEB4 9328 0D44 7AC6 7E73 BCBF 1F19 20BC
Tell the truth or trump--but get the trick.
-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"
------------------------------
From: "Marc D. Behr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Automatically cut ppp link
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 12:49:59 -0500
Patrick Clauberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using a linux box to connect me to the internet and I manually
> start / stop the ppp thing.
>
> Some days ago I forgot to hang up and noticed it the next morning.
> :-((((
>
> How do I control the ppp link, and automatically cut it after a
> certain time without traffic?
>
> I tried the diald , but don't like it
>
> Thanx
>
> Patrick
Patrick,
Have you tried using the demand-dial option of pppd? This will cause the
link to come up when needed and dies after all traffic has stopped.
In your options file, add
demand
idle 900
To have the link die after 15 minutes of idle time.
Marc
--
Marc D. Behr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key ID: 0x1F1920BC
Fingerprint20 = 7DC2 3B63 EEB4 9328 0D44 7AC6 7E73 BCBF 1F19 20BC
Tell the truth or trump--but get the trick.
-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Martin)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 05:53:12 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please don't feed the troll. Thanks.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, it says Randal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My, how pleasent. Spend much time with street kids do you?
>
>On Tue, 05 Jan 1999, DG wrote:
[Nothing of any relevance to any of these many groups.]
--
Kevin Martin No-spam zone.
<brasscannon No prisoners. No warning shots.
@usa.net>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux better than NT 4.0 for file and print?
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 17:10:11 GMT
I'm hoping to get some good suggestions for what I'm thinking of doing, I'm
sure someone has done this before...
I currently run file and printer sharing through a Digital Prioris Server
5166 running Windows NT 4.0 SP3. Attached to that box is a Digital
StorageWorks RAID array. The box has it's own RAID controller and the server
has an Adaptec SCSI controller in it for the RAID. Overall, it's a pretty
standard config. The server is a p166 with 512Mb of RAM.
The problem: Printing services are often quite slow, as with file serving
especially during higher volume time periods. I routinely see the CPU at over
50% peaking to 100% and the RAM useage climbs to about 400mb. To be fair, the
network does see too much activity, but I know it's not totally to fault for
the bad performance.
The MS Solution: Buy a big whoop-ass server for a lot of money, but NT 4.0
for it, then buy NT 2000 in a year when that comes out so I'm y2k compliant.
Well, I don't care much for the MS solution. I've never been very pleased
with MS servers because of reliability problems but I'm not very familiar
with the Unix family either aside from a 'toy' Linux box I've had for about a
year. I've been running samba on my 'toy' for a while and it works well,
though I've never put it under a good load.
These are my companies needs: This server must continue to be our file/print
server for a mix of Windows 95, NT, and Macintosh clients. It must work well
with HP printers using HP print servers. For example, HP 5Si/MX, 5M, III, 4p,
etc. How well can Linux handle this? From what I've read, it will do a great
job, but I would love to hear from someone who's done this.
A couple notes about my network: This is one of four NT servers I've got, the
others handle Exchange, database, etc. The file server in question is not the
primary domain controller. My network is shared 10Mb, soon to be switched
100. We use the typical office apps (Word, Excel, blah blah blah) and have
designers making fairly large files (10Mb to 2Gb).
A couple general questions...
My RAID drive is NTFS. Can Linux read/write NTFS? Can Linux understand my
current permissions structure or do I need to redo all of my permissions under
Samba?
Does Linux have anything that works like Exchange server? I like what
Exchange does (task management, scheduling, web based outlook, etc) but like
most MS apps I've got here, it's not very stable and it's very pricey.
Thanks in advance for any help, I appreciate it. Overall I think this could
be a fun way to test the power of Linux, I just need to make certain that
it's up to the job before I make it a mainstream OS. I don't want to create
more problems for myself ;)
-Paul
If you respond, can you please CC your responce to my email also? I don't
have the opportunity to check news groups very often. use
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DirecPC
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 18:54:43 GMT
In linux.redhat.misc Chip Transisto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I've been trying to set up my new linux thru my win98 direcpc. No
: luck. I can ping the win98 machine, connect with samba but can't get
: out through the NAT I have set up in the win98. I think that it is a
: configuration problem. Does anyone know how to set this up? What is
: my domain? and things like that. Thanks.
There is a piece of software called Wingate which will allow you to set
up your '98 box as a proxy server. It has a free 2-user license, or if
you're unethical, you can get a keycode generator off of a warez site,
and use an illegally licensed copy to hook up as many machines as you
want.
--
patowic jurai net
Cabal Obsidian Order # i. Cabal #e. TINC.
"Do you expect me to talk?"
"No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to _die_."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PPP Dial-Up Access S L O W!
Date: 6 Jan 1999 19:00:03 GMT
O. J. Glembocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-> I have exactly the same problem with my Redhat 5.1 installation. I have a
-> Zoom 56K modem that is jumper configured for COM3 IRQ5. I too have tried
-> all sorts of DNS, MTU, RTU configurations and get "stalled" (message in
-> Netscape) transfers. Slow is VERY VERY slow: in WIN 95 I get anywhere
-> from 3000 to 4000 bytes per sec, while in Linux I get a whopping 30-80 bytes
-> per sec. I too an a Linux infant and am lost as how to solve this.
-> Thanks much in advance for any help.
This is a classic symptom of an IRQ conflict...
Try running:
setserial /dev/ttyS2
at a root prompt and see which IRQ *it* thinks is associated with COM3
(COM3 (dos) <=> /dev/ttyS2 <=> /dev/cua2).
You can change the interrupt associated with the serial port with
setserial <port> irq <x>
in your case it would be:
setserial /dev/ttyS2 irq 5
from the root prompt.
Also make sure that the serial port speed in your comm program
configuration matches the speed reported by setserial.
I had an additional problem.... My modem worked fine until I configured
my PnP sound card (via sndconfig). It decided to grab IRQ 5 away from my
modem. After disabling my sound card, my modem worked just fine again.
I'm still working on reconfiguring my sound card with the PnP tools so I
can use it and the modem at the same time.
HTH
Simeon
------------------------------
From: Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: US modem in UK machine says "NO DIAL TONE"
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 14:01:35 -0500
Chris Rankin <net.bellsouth@{no.spam}rankinc> writes:
> I have tried to install an old 33.6 Kbps modem into an even older UK
> machine.
Ben Elliston wrote:
> There can be subtle differences in the dial tone signal that will
> cause modems to do this in other countries.
> Try using the lowest set of response codes (ATX0, perhaps?) and if it
> prevents the ``NO DIALTONE'' message, your modem should dial "blind".
I tried this: using ATX3 I was able to get the modem to dial but then it
just sat there; it looked like the modem didn't hear ANYTHING on the
line. The 28.8 kbps modem had no difficulty (same line, same cable). I
tried the diagnostic tests AT&T1 and AT&T8 and they both checked out,
although setting S18=10 NEVER made the tests timeout ... most odd. As a
last desperate measure I configured the modem via the jumpers rather
than using PnP - absolutely no difference. I am currently at a loss ...
Cheers,
Chris.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dropped RX Packets on Interface ppp0
Date: 6 Jan 1999 11:58:54 +0800
I once have this problem also, but it's not because of PPP packet
size. I installed the irqtune which set to priority of the serial
interrupt to a higher position, then all the packet drop problem gone.
Try to look into irqtune packet. It works for me!
> Thrasher wrote:
>> Here's a clip from my ifconfig on ppp0:
>>
>> ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
>>
>> inet addr:x.x.x.x P-t-P:x.x.x.x Mask:255.255.255.0
>> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:159 errors:18 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:17
>> TX packets:133 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> Collisions:0 Memory:24f3034-24f3c00
>>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 16:24:57 +1000
From: Daniel Zanatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Name Resolution
Can some one tell me how or whether (or where I can find the information) linux
supports WINS name resolution. I've setup Redhat 5.2 on a machine at work where
we are not running DNS, we rely on WINS for our name resolution. I cant work
out how to enable the name resolution for WINS. If someone could please point
me in the right direction I would be most grateful.
TIA,
Daniel.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help with traffic shaper
Date: 6 Jan 1999 14:18:01 +0800
Change the line:
#include <../linux/drivers/net/shaper.h>
To:
#include </usr/src/linux/drivers/net/shaper.h>
GaG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I have some problems with traffic shaper.
> i have download shapecfg but i can't compile it (it says .../shaper.h
> not found), i have try to find one but it's not the good one.
> If someone can send me this proggy compiled and/or the correct
> shaper.h it will be very very cool.
> cya
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "George Csahanin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet as root
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 19:48:57 GMT
Jumping in on the tail end here, but are you sure that you want to be able
to telnet in as root? I have three computers on internet, and would never
want to be able to do that. What I do is login as me, then do "su" and get
in as root. Makes it more secure. But, again, I missed the first part of
this, it may be a secure network already...
-G
Jason P. Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>On Tue, 5 Jan 1999 08:23:03 +0200, "Bertie Price"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>To telnet as root:
>>First telnet as a normal user -
>>Do a "ps a" on the linux box and see what tty you came in on.
>> eg "ttyp0"
>>Now edit /etc/securetty and add "ttyp0" to the bottom of the file.
>>You should now be able to telnet as root.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Huh? What flavor of linux are you running? I've never heard of this
>before.
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank da Cruz)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: Problem building C-Kermit on Linux (Redhat) 5.2
Date: 6 Jan 1999 19:53:21 GMT
In article <76tceq$f94$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tim Hedger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I've downloaded the latest version of kermit (release 192) for linux from
: mit.columbia.edu, and tried to build it under Linux on my PC.
:
You mean kermit.columbia.edu.
: I'm getting all sorts of compilation errors when I try to build...
:
In any case, version 192 is not the latest. Version 6.1 is in Beta test,
and does not have the problems you report (note that these problems came
up because of changes in Linux *after* C-Kermit 6.0.192 was released):
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/ck61.html
In a few days, I expect to be announcing C-Kermit 7.0 for public testing.
It builds fine in all the latest releases of Red Hat, Slackware, etc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse) wrote:
: Try look for kermit on the redhat site.
:
No, please always get Kermit from the Kermit site:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/
Nobody should be distributing "fixed" versions of Kermit except Columbia.
Anybody who has fixes should send them in to us and not post them elsewhere,
since then they take on a life of their own, and soon multiple incompatible
versions begin to float around, which always come back to haunt us, sometimes
as much as 10 years later.
: As far as I remember there is
: an SRPMS file which contians the compile and patch files, but not the
: tar.gz file, which you need to get separately from Columbia University.
: (License restriction). The problem is that you should NOT #include
: anything from /usr/inlcude/linux. This is a thing of the past.
:
Right. That's why we have new versions. In the past, we needed to include
kernel headers in order to get at high serial speeds, which nobody could
live without. Now high serial speeds are obtained in a natural way.
- Frank
------------------------------
From: Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: How to use 2 DNS servers ?
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 19:54:09 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jim Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > I have two interfaces on my linux system, one for my local network, the
>> > other for the ouside internet.
>> >
>> > I need to configure 2 DNS servers, dns.mydomain.com for local resolve
>> > which is authoritative for mydomain.com, and the other for internet DNS.
>>
>> Why do you think that you need two? An single DNS server can be both
>> authorative for some domains and act as a recursive server for others.
>
>This is true, but probably irrelevant. The original poster could have
>all sorts of reasons for needing two DNS servers. Perhaps they
>want/need split DNS to hide their internal names from the outside or
>vice versa? Perhaps they want no zone transfers for mydomain.com to
>succeed on the non-authoritative server? Perhaps they have something
>which depends on getting non-authoritative answers from the DNS. (It's
>unlikely, but we don't know...)
In fact, if you're an ISP that offers DNS hosting service, it's
*recommended* that you use different servers for authoritative and
recursive service. One feature of this is if a customer relocates their
DNS to another ISP, but forgets to tell you to remove it from your server,
your other customers don't get the obsolete information.
--
Barry Margolin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Don't bother cc'ing followups to me.
------------------------------
From: "Jay D Ribak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to serve two domains ?
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 14:54:25 -0500
Yes it is possible. I am currently serving over 100 domains on my name
servers. Large web hosts out there serve thousands of them.
In a nutshell, you need to create a similar zone file for the second domain
as you have for the first one. So, you will have something like
db.mydomain.com and a db.mydomain.net. Make sure that the named.conf file
is edited to load both zones.
You can simply point several A records or CNAMEs to one IP address.
The DNS howto may have more info on doing this.
I also highly recommend the DNS and BIND book by O'Reilly. The 3rd edition
is out now and I hear its pretty slick. I have been using the 2nd edition
for some time.
Good Luck
Jay R
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bj�rn Hellmann wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Hi all,
would it be possible serve two domains by one NS ?
E.g. mydomain.com + mydomain.net
which shall result in e.g.
host.mydomain.com = host.mydomain.net = 1.2.3.4
How to configure DNS that way ?
Thanks for any help !
Bj�rn Hellmann
------------------------------
From: "George Csahanin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP connection
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 19:55:58 GMT
Are you asking it to lookup a host that has a bad dns entry?
from a shell prompt try nslookup something.you.are sure.of.com. You've
probably already done this, but couldn't hurt to point it out. Then assuming
that you can do the above, open netscape, and point at the same host. See
what happens.
-GC
Wolfgang Grossbauer wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi folks,
>since a few days I'm fiddling on my LINUX internet connection, but it still
>does not work.
>The system is a SuSE 5.3 and "/etc/ppp/ppp-up" connects to my provider and
>it looks good.
>But how dow I get Netscape started? Currently I starx the windowsmanager
>(vwm2 or so) and the start Netscape.
>All I get is that there is ".... no DNS entry", but the /etc/hosts,
>/etc/resolv.conf are set up properly.
>Below is the ifconfig-output of the ppp0 when the ppp connection to the IP
>is up.
>
>ppp0 Link encap:Point-Point Protocol
> inet addr:195.70.98.160 P-t-P:195.70.98.193 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>
>Thanks for help,
>Wolfgang Grossbauer
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: pppd error message
Date: 6 Jan 1999 13:38:12 -0600
Darrin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I get an error message of:
: pppd: demand dialling is not supported by kernel driver version 2.2.0
: But my ppp version is 2.3.5-2.
: Can anyone tell me what kernel driver version this message is referring to??
Version 2.2.0 of course. This is the version for the *kernel* ppp code,
not the version of the ppp package with pppd. You apparently use RH
(from the `-2' attached to the ppp package version 2.3.5), and I don't so
I'm not sure how much this will help but...
A pristine ppp-2.3.5 package comes with *.c and *.h files that are copied
into the kernel source tree during the installation process. A known
versioning problem for 2.3.5 can prevent at least one of these pieces,
ppp.c, from being copied to the kernel source tree. The new code is
necessary for demand dialing and when the kernel is then recompiled it
is the old code that is compiled, thus the problem you report above.
The solution for RH users may be to get a more recent patch level in
which this problem might be fixed.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: "Andrew Ip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Two ip addresses on one NIC
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 12:33:34 -0800
Is it possible to do it? As far as I know Mac can bind two ip on one card
with VicomSoft's Internet Gateway. Thanks.
-Andrew
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
