Linux-Networking Digest #830, Volume #9 Sat, 9 Jan 99 18:13:44 EST
Contents:
Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems) (Michael Ransburg)
Re: problem with samba (not password encryption) (Matthew Papas)
weirdness in ftp (Eric Melville)
Re: Ethernet card recommendation--urgent (Wenshui Gan)
suse 5.3: problems with ppp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: RJ-45 network needs hub ? ("tonni")
Re: Permitting users to start PPPD
Re: RJ-45 network needs hub ? (Paul E Larson)
linksys with bad irq setting ("Jay J Klauminzer II")
PPP 2.3.5 and BellAtlantic.net (Frank Hale)
Re: Help: I am not a new user but when I connect to my ISP insted of login prompt I
get all sorts of stupid symbols.... ("Thomas Humburg")
PPP problems (Frank Hale)
Re: Virtual FTP ("Danny Johnson")
Sendpage & Pagesend (Jean-Francois Bigras)
large packet loss and DUPS with 3com and RH4.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux-Router =?iso-8859-1?Q?h=E4ngt?= sich auf (Felix Schreiber)
Re: Telneting as "root" ("Fabrizio Carrai")
Re: Proxy on Proxy (Scott Gregg)
win98, winNT, and Linux ("CPA")
pppd with NT (Andreas Birkholz)
Need help with getting Ehternet internet connection up on Red Had 5.2 and laptop
(Kirk Moon)
Re: Connection refused from remote X-Windows ("Jim Orfanakos")
Have linux ras support callback? (Josh Gentry)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Ransburg)
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,alt.sex.fetish.linux,at.linux,de.comp.os.unix.linux.hardware,de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc,de.comp.os.unix.linux.newusers,fido.ger.linux,fido.linux-ger,maus.os.linux
Subject: Re: Standleitung (Analog mit Modems)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 18:41:56 GMT
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 19:35:28 +0100, Roman Spitzbart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hast du Angst, dass dich keiner beachtet, weil du in so viele Newsgroups
>gepostet hast (obwohl eine Linux-Frage in alt.sex.fetish sicher mal was
>anderes ist).
Guck mal genau hin:
alt.sex.fetish.linux
Das waer doch mal was *abhau* ;)
mike
>Roman
>
>
------------------------------
From: Matthew Papas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: problem with samba (not password encryption)
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 17:13:17 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One one machine "a":
> Linux redhat 5.1, pam, samba, smb.conf exporting one public file system
>
> Another machine "b":
> NT 4.0, sp3
>
> On the NT machine, i see machine "b" in network neighborhood, but when i click
> on it to look for the exported public file system, nt gives me the error msg:
> "unable to acces machine b. The network path was not found".
Sounds like it isn't translating the NETBIOS names.
You might want to try putting an entry in to translate the NETBIOS names on the
NT machines to see if they are translating the name correctly. (Is it LMHOSTS on
NT also?) also try:
net view \\NAMEOFTHELINUXBOX
to see if the machine is showing up properly (i think that works in NT too)
or from the linux box type
nmblookup -d 2 '*'
that should come up with all the smb clients runnung on the network (the NT's and
the Linux box)
>
You could also try setting the NT machines to resolve netbios names using DNS and
make sure that they either have the entries themselves for the linux host, or
that the DNS server has the proper entries.
Hope that helps some
Matt
>
>
> I set up a machine "c" with a fresh nt version, same message.
>
> Is my linux smb not configured right?
>
> Thanks for the help!!
>
> david broman
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Eric Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: weirdness in ftp
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 22:50:15 GMT
i've got one ip, shared, for 8 computers. then i've got an ftp server
running on one of these computers. when this computer was a telnt bbs,
all i had to do was big a port to forward to that computer, and have
that computer listen on that port.
i'm not having nearly as much with wu.ftpd as i had with my bbs
software... i made wu.ftpd listen on port 921. people can connect to the
server, but they can't do anything (ie list files, get/put, etc).
i guessed this might be because of that ftpdata thing on port 20. so i
forwarded port 920 to the ftpserv computer, and changed it's
/etc/services to say: ftpdata [tcp and udp] 920 ...
but this didn't help at all. how come people can connect to the server,
but then not be able to do anything?
any ideas?
-E
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wenshui Gan)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.hardware,redhat.networking.general,iu.linux
Subject: Re: Ethernet card recommendation--urgent
Date: 8 Jan 1999 22:47:00 GMT
I have been using an Intel pro 10/100b card with Linux at work for more than a
year. I works well for me. I haven't seen any problems.
Wenshui
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: suse 5.3: problems with ppp
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 14:29:59 GMT
hi all,
i'm trying to get ppp under suse linux 5.3 work.
everything is configured as explained in the handbook.
but if i run /etc/suseppp/scripts/ppp-up:
'kernel lacks ppp-support' comes up. actually this is not true.
(the kernel is compiled with ppp and other networking support)
the /var/log/messages file:
Jan 9 15:07:08 sexslave kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
allocation) Jan 9 15:07:08 sexslave kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation
code copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc. Jan 9 15:07:08 sexslave kernel: PPP line
discipline registered. Jan 9 15:07:08 sexslave syslog: ioctl(TIOCGETD): Not
a typewriter
presumably the last line is the problem
the modem is a noname 56k connected to ttyS0 (it works fine under NT4.0)
any ideas?
TIV
Wolfgang
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "tonni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RJ-45 network needs hub ?
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 21:33:28 GMT
just get a crossed cable thats it make sure of the pins
1236 straight 3612 crossed good luck i use this my self with 2 boxes
Lorenzo Delloni wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I reported before a problem of connection between my labtop and my Linux
>PC. I did not mention that the Etherlink III 3 com card was provided
>with a cable allowing direct connection of the computer to a RJ-45
>socket and that I plug this cable to the RJ-45 out of my NE2000
>compatible card. I have asked for advices in some of the tones of PC
>shops close to Tottenham in London. If I exclude the stupids remarks
>concerning the fact that I am not able to install the driver and they
>can do it for me for �45 !!! or that it's not possible Linux with Win95
>! The most raisonable remark was that for a RJ-45 network, even between
>two computers, you definitely need a hub. Is that true ? I am a bit
>sceptic of what these computers vendors say !
>
>Thanks
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Permitting users to start PPPD
Date: 9 Jan 1999 15:15:17 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Baptiste Clemence) writes:
>
> Can anyone help me give users access to pppd? I can start
> my ppp connection by running ppp-on as root. However, if I
> try to run ppp-on as a user, the modem will dial and establish
> a connection, then drop carrier. Obviously, I can use sudo,
> and myself, I can use su, but it seems there should be a
> cleaner solution.
>
> I thought I had all the user permissions set properly, but
> I've obviously missed something.
>
> The only clues I have are from my syslog and messages files:
> (the time stamps aren't exact, but who cares. . .)
> I'm not yet good enough to know what these mean.
>
> In syslog:
> xx:46:44 ioctl(PPPIOCGUNT): operation not permitted
> xx:46:44 ioctl(PPPIOCGDEBUG): operation not permitted
>
> In messages:
> xx:46:18 pppd 2.2.0 started by <user>, uid <xxxx>
> xx:46:18 Serial connection established
> xx:46:44 Exit
>
> Thanks
> Jean-Baptiste Clemence
>
Hi,
You might need to make pppd suid root and thats all.
I would recommend creating a group that is allowed to dial-out as opposed
to letting any user bring up the link. Heres an example using
shadowed passwords.
'groupadd -g 1005 dialout' (create the group)
'usermod -u 1001 -g 1001 -G dialout,cdrom,floppy,audio myusername'
(add yourself to the new group and any other groups you are a member of)
'chgrp dialout /dev/ttyS3' (change the modem to device to the new group)
'chmod g+rw,o-rwx /dev/ttyS3' (deny access to non-group members)
'chgrp dialout /usr/sbin/pppd' (change group of pppd)
'chmod g+x,o-rwx /usr/sbin/pppd' (make it executable by group only)
'chmod u+s /usr/sbin/pppd' (make it suid root)
Now members of the group dialout should be able to bring up the link.
Hope this helps,
Dave
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul E Larson)
Subject: Re: RJ-45 network needs hub ?
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 21:38:54 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lorenzo Delloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I reported before a problem of connection between my labtop and my Linux
>PC. I did not mention that the Etherlink III 3 com card was provided
>with a cable allowing direct connection of the computer to a RJ-45
>socket and that I plug this cable to the RJ-45 out of my NE2000
>compatible card. I have asked for advices in some of the tones of PC
>shops close to Tottenham in London. If I exclude the stupids remarks
>concerning the fact that I am not able to install the driver and they
>can do it for me for �45 !!! or that it's not possible Linux with Win95
You have to configure Samba to do this.
>! The most raisonable remark was that for a RJ-45 network, even between
>two computers, you definitely need a hub. Is that true ? I am a bit
No.... you can buy/make a crossover cable. To make see -
http://www.linksys.com/support/faqs/howbuild/wiring.htm I found this useful
when putting a new end on a cable, the color chart worked great for me. Where
I live in New York you can buy a 6' crossover cable for under $15 or approx.
9.14 British pounds.
Paul
Get rid of the blahs to email me :}
------------------------------
From: "Jay J Klauminzer II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linksys with bad irq setting
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 16:47:10 -0500
I am having trouble with this new card I bought...
It's a linksys combo pci2 card, which was promised to work in linux with the
ne driver (they said to use that instead of the ne2kpci). With redhat 5.2 in
the start up of linux i get an error stating that irq of 255 will most
likely not work. There are no jumpers (strictly PnP) and whenever I try to
run the setup program in windows or DOS, it freezes automatically. Even if I
set the irq in linux, it doesn't read that at boot time, therefore my card
doesn't activate. When I try to activate it in netcfg, I get a delaying
initialization of eth0 error. It's set up to use DHCP and I manually put in
the name servers to avoid any trouble. I've tried everything I can think of
short of purchasing a new card... anyone have suggestions?
-Jay J Klauminzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP 2.3.5 and BellAtlantic.net
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 16:51:29 -0500
How come I can connect to BellAtlantic.net with PPP 2.2.0f-5 but when I
upgrade to the newest version say the one that came with my RedHat 5.2
system it won't connect. I have had to downgrade this package evertime I
upgraded RH from 5.0 - 5.1 and now 5.2.
Has anyone been able to connect to BellAtlantic.net with a new version
of PPP?
say PPP 2.3.5????
Thanx........
I am using RH 5.2, wvdial and PPP 2.2.0f-5 (on that shipped with redhat
5.0 powertools) currently
--
From: Frank Hale
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 7205161
Homepage: http://members.xoom.com/frankhale/
Jade: http://jade.netpedia.net/
------------------------------
From: "Thomas Humburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help: I am not a new user but when I connect to my ISP insted of login
prompt I get all sorts of stupid symbols....
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 12:22:18 +0100
Reply-To: "Thomas Humburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb in Nachricht
<771vms$d4e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Reply me only at: Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>--- When I try to connect to my ISP via dial up connection It dosent
connect
>and I tried minicom to see what did I get. I got connected but after that
I
>get some trash and studpid symbols instead of login prompt.... I have got
>SLIP compiled in also... It is not a PPP problem because I am unable to get
>even login prompt when I dial up.
>
>So my ppp-on scripts were not working so I used minicom to see , but insted
of
>prompt I got trash on screen....
I think your ISP wants you to authenticate via pap. With pap you don't get a
login prompt.
Try the pppd option name myname. And make an entry in pap-secrets for your
name and password.
--
hope this helps
------------------------------
From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP problems
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 16:53:56 -0500
When I upgrade my PPP package to the latest 2.3.5 and connect to
Bellatlantic.net I get the following error when connecting
pppd[9528]: No response to PAP authenticate-requests
But if I downgrade my package to PPP 2.2.0f-5 it will connect and work
perfectly. Does anyone know what the difference is in the way the two
versions authenticate PAP? Can anyone connect using the newest version
of PPP 2.3.5?
I am using RH 5.2 and I have to downgrade my PPP to version 2.2.0f-5 to
connect.
--
From: Frank Hale
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 7205161
Homepage: http://members.xoom.com/frankhale/
Jade: http://jade.netpedia.net/
------------------------------
From: "Danny Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Virtual FTP
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 21:56:02 GMT
"Virtual FTP"? Please explain what you mean for those of us who are
ignorant.
Mark Hamilton wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I remember reading somewhere in a howto or man page or something about
>getting software for doing a virtual FTP for virtual domains. Can anyone
>tell me where to find that software, or at least where I read it because I
>think it had the place to find it.
>Thanks
>
>
------------------------------
From: Jean-Francois Bigras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Sendpage & Pagesend
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 15:48:28 +0000
When I do "sendpage -p 491771 Message", this line appear: "destination
pin 491771: request id is 17 for host localhost" but the modem do not
want to dial.
These are my config files:
etc/pagermap:
=============
49177(.*) 4726512/49177\1
49171(.*) 4792365/49171\1
etc/config.cua3:
================
CountryCode: 1
AreaCode: 450
FAXNumber: 4724337
LongDistancePrefix: 1
InternationalPrefix: 011
DialStringRules: etc/dialrules
ServerTracing: 1
SessionTracing: 11
RecvFileMode: 0600
LogFileMode: 0600
DeviceMode: 0600
RingsBeforeAnswer: 1
SpeakerVolume: off
GettyArgs: "-h %l %s"
LocalIdentifier: "Big"
TagLineFont: etc/lutRS18.pcf
TagLineFormat: "From %%l|%c|Page %%p of %%t"
MaxRecvPages: 25
ModemType: Class1 # use this to supply a hint
Class1Cmd: AT+FCLASS=1 # command to enter class 1
Class1TCFResponseDelay: 75 # 75ms delay between recv TCF &
response
Class1SendPPMDelay: 75 # 75ms delay before sending PPM
Class1SendTCFDelay: 75 # 75ms delay between sending DCS
& TCF
Class1TrainingRecovery: 1500 # 1.5sec delay after training
failure
Class1RecvAbortOK: 200 # wait 200ms for abort response
Class1FrameOverhead: 4 # 4 byte overhead in recvd HDLC
frames
Class1RecvIdentTimer: 40000 # 35+5secs waiting for ident
frames
Class1TCFMaxNonZero: 10 # max 10% of data may be
non-zero
Class1TCFMinRun: 1000 # min run is 2/3rds of TCF
duration
#
PagerSetupCmds: "AT&N0&K4"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: large packet loss and DUPS with 3com and RH4.2
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 15:44:51 GMT
Hi,
I have read every HOW TO I could find and also the Network administrator's
guide and searched most of the newsgroups and tried a LOT of different
setting, still same results. I am finally resorting to the newsgroups hoping
to learn from you and later be able to help others :-)
I am setting up a linux box as a file server at our school. I installed RedHat
4.2 which went smooth. I am not able to ping any of our Mac or PC clients.
(Although sometimes I get a response with DUPS and large packet loss) I
installed the networking option and it is enabled. 3COM card was recognized.
Cabling is fine since our NT is working ok with the same hub and cables, even
tried changing the cables.
Here is my setup
Linux box IP 192.168.1.1
255.255.255.0
Clients 192.168.1.2 etc.....
gateway 192.168.1.254 (not connected to any other networks, just connected a
few clients to test so far, no Internet access)
Tried both enable route and disable route
not using DNS yet, just Hosts file.
Can ping the LINUX 3com 3c5098 card.
After ping -f, ran netstat -i and got:
lo RX 24703 TX 24703
eth0 RX 800 TX 851
After ping -f to the client I get :
lo RX 51 TX 51
eth0 RX 96 TX 147
All lights flash on the hub and NIC's. I am assuming that after installing
RedHat 4.2 with networking option it is already configured to at least be able
to ping another client, am I wrong to assume this. Everything else was set up
it seemed.
I read a lot about the plug and play NIC. I didn't disable the P&P but I am
assuming that because the install recognized my card and I am able to ping
the card, there is no problems with the I/O or IRQ. Maybe am wrong to
assume this. I am just a teacher that volunteers to administer the school
network. It is a lot of fun though.
Thanks,
Paul Daniels
Tokai University
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Felix Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Linux-Router =?iso-8859-1?Q?h=E4ngt?= sich auf
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 16:49:39 +0100
Dabei hat alles auf Anhieb geklappt!
Ich habe einen Compaq Prolinea mit 486/66, 24MB und SuSE Linux 5.3.
Er dient als ISDN-Router f�r ein kleines Windows-NT Netzwerk. Die
ISDN-Karte ist eine Creatix PnP.
Eigentlich funktioniert alles. Ich kann von jedem Rechner aus den Router
und Adressen im Internet anpingen. Ich kann auch auf jedem Client
l�ngere
Zeit im Internet surfen und Daten runterladen.
Nur leider st�zt Linux regelm��ig, wenn ich gr��ere Dateien per FTP
runterlade (so ab ca 3MB) ohne irgendeine Fehlermeldung ab. Das
bedeutet,
Linux reagiert nicht mehr auf die Maus, es reagiert nicht
mehr auf die Tastatur und auf dem Bildschirm tut sich auch nichts mehr,
au�er da� der Cursor ganznormal weiterblinkt.�ber das Netzwerk ist der
Rechner dann auch nicht mehr zu erreichen. Das einzige was dann noch
hilft,
ist der Netz-Schalter.
Leider kenne ich mich mit Linux noch nicht so gut aus und wei�
deshalb nicht, in welchen Log-Dateien ich etwas �ber das Problem meines
Routers finden k�nnte.
Ich w�re dankbar f�r alle Ideen und Hinweise
Felix
------------------------------
From: "Fabrizio Carrai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Telneting as "root"
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 20:22:34 +0100
Earth ha scritto nel messaggio <775da7$kt3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>A.G. ha scritto nel messaggio <773kl8$8nu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>I have just configured two ethernet cards to connect two linux machines.
>>
>>I can remotely telnet to any of the machines, but not as root to either.
>>Just as a regular user.
>>
>>Is this normal or I have misconfigured smth?
>>
>>Thanx a lot!
Look in your /etc/securetty file!
Fabrizio Carrai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Gregg)
Subject: Re: Proxy on Proxy
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 22:05:39 GMT
On Sat, 9 Jan 1999 16:23:38 +0800, "wkchiu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>In the department I am working, there is a PC which can go to internet
>through setting proxy in the browser. The IP address of the PC is registered
>in the company in order to access the proxy, so that other desktop PC (like
>mine) can't go to internet in the same way.
>
>I recently installed RH 5.2 to that PC. I want to install proxy server S/W
>on that PC so that our desktop PCs can all go out to internet through that
>PC. Can anyone suggest what S/W is needed (and the settings involved) to
>allow that RH5.2 box in one way to act as proxy server, and on the other
>hand to go to internet through proxy ?
>
>Thanks,
>wkchiu
>
muffin
very easy to setup, set permissions, IP and port and your off
squid, not as easy, more functionality, etc... more involved setup
apache, feature rich, not so easy to setup, use it as a intranet also
------------------------------
From: "CPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: win98, winNT, and Linux
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 01:25:56 -0600
Hi there,
I would like to put three OS in a hard drive which are WIN98, WinNT
Workstation, and Linux. Could someone please tell me how should I patition
the harddrive. Or youu can direct me to a website if you know one.
Many thanks
------------------------------
From: Andreas Birkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd with NT
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 23:10:07 +0100
Hi folks,
I need to get a Linux client work on an NT server with RAS. Linux client
dials in but authentification doesn't work. Additionally the client has
to be set up to handle a call back because the server should call the
client after authentification. Tho complete the difficulties the server
gives the client the IP address dynamically out of a pool of 8
addresses. How con I configure that under Linux ???
I would be really happy if anybody can give me a hint to solve just one
of these problems.
Thank you
Andreas Birkholz
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kirk Moon)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Need help with getting Ehternet internet connection up on Red Had 5.2 and
laptop
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 22:12:40 GMT
Would appreciate any help with my problem.
Running Red Hat 5.2 on a Micron Transport XKE laptop. Laptop is
plugged in to a Micron docking station which has a DEC Tulip ethernet
card inside. I have an ADSL hookup (full time internet connection with
fixed IP address). Able to run all of my internet ops without problem
using Windows 98 on the same hardware. Can't get it to wok with Linux.
I have all of the necessary addresses entered in the Linuxconf file.
I get all of the usual successful startup messages for Ethernet in the
boot process. The Tulio driver for eth0 is loaded. My software tells
me that the ethernet setup is active, but I can't get out onto the
net. When I ping the localhost it works, but I can't get it to ping
anything on the net. I can't ping the DNS, the gateway, or any other
mahine on my home lan. All packets are dropped. I don't get nay
errors, just nothing. Can't get anything else to work.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
To reply, delete the "xx"s in the email address.
------------------------------
From: "Jim Orfanakos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Connection refused from remote X-Windows
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 11:04:11 -0500
I tried "xhost +<hostbame>" and I tried opening it right up "xhosts +". I
still get connection failures.
Steve Irwin wrote in message <7766ed$eaq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>On the linux box, type xhosts <hostname> where hostname is the windows
machine
>name.
>
>Jim Orfanakos wrote:
>
>> I am using X-Win32 on a Win95 PC trying to connect to a RedHat 5.1
system.
>> Whenever I try to start an X application I get connection refused after I
>> enter my userid and password. I tried rsh as well as rexec.
>>
>> If I telnet in, then start the application sending it back to the remote
pc
>> via "-display" it works. If log in directly to the RedHat 5.1 server
and
>> send the application back to the remote pc via "-display" it works.
>>
>> I have open the system up in /etc/securetty and
/etc/security/access.conf
>> but no luck.
>>
>> Any Ideas?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> Jim Orfanakos
>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/djo3
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josh Gentry)
Subject: Have linux ras support callback?
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 08:04:21 -0800
I think mgetty might support this. check the online documentation at
http://www.leo.org/~doering/mgetty
Josh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** Posted from RemarQ - http://www.remarq.com - Discussions Start Here (tm) ***
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
