Linux-Networking Digest #837, Volume #9 Sun, 10 Jan 99 06:13:30 EST
Contents:
Re: PPP in RH 5.2 (Eric Miller)
Re: Help: Linksys Etherfast 10/100 Cardbus NIC w. Cirrus PD6832 cardbus controller?
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Samba.conf and host allow ("Paul Bary")
Re: sharing a cablemodem (with 1 NIC?) ("tonni")
Re: BellAtlantic.net and PPP 2.3.5 (Frank Hale)
Re: SPX sockets (kernel 2.2.0-pre5) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
BRAND NEW COMIC PICTURES ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: IP Forwarding & Routing ("Hervey Wilson")
Re: [Q] Brief Exp. for networking. (jongarmpark)
Re: Networking Linux to Win95 (Paul Branston)
Re: proxy server (Standard-Nutzer Holger)
Diald and routing! (Nickolai Sergienko)
D-Link DFE-530TX PCI ("Johan H�gdahl")
Re: win98, winNT, and Linux (Athan)
PAM authentication failure with ftp ("Wout Verschueren")
Win98 - Linux [Which FAST protocol ?] (Athan)
* Need MX in POP3 form (root)
ppp with isdn (tom)
Re: RJ-45 network needs hub ? (Athan)
Re: 3com 3c509tp problems being detected (Paul Branston)
What linux works best with a cable modem? (smile)
Re: Why can PPP configure the DNS server address dynamically? (Brian McCauley)
Re: SIOCADDRT: Invalid Argument (Art Asbury)
Re: pppd error message (Art Asbury)
ISDN worked fine, now strange (Joachim Knoke)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Eric Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: PPP in RH 5.2
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 23:12:18 -0800
A.G. wrote:
>
> Is it only me, or is PPP setup in RedHat all screwed up?
It's not you...The netconfig/linuxconf gui will work, but a common
problem is an error in the pap-script. I was surprised that you need a
netmask for your ISP? Anyway, if it dials,connects, and then drops the
connection, then I'd bet dollars to donuts it's in the connection
script. There's a window in the conifig gui that displays the
pap-script. Try removing some of those lines with just a tilde (~). But
first, try connecting again and then immediately type cat
/var/log/messages (you'll probably have to be root for that). If it
shows the connection, and then your ISP drops the connection, it's the
pap-script. Forget that stuff in the HOWTOs 'cause RedHat setup is not
covered in any of them. Don't feel bad, this is a common problem (it
took me two weeks of fiddling to figure it out!).
--
Eric Miller: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tidepool.com/~egm2
There once was a fellow named Pope,
Who plugged into an oscilloscope.
The cyclical trace
Of their carnal embrace
Had a damn near infinite slope.
-- Thomas Pynchon
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help: Linksys Etherfast 10/100 Cardbus NIC w. Cirrus PD6832 cardbus
controller?
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 06:12:15 GMT
I had exactly the same problem on my Sony PCG-808 laptop with a
different cardbus controller (Ricoh, I think). I got it working by
installing the 3.0.7 PCMCIA Card Services package from Stanford
(ftp://hyper.stanford.edu/pub/pcmcia/). I think this was just posted
a couple of days ago. Comments in the Changelog mentioned bugfixes
related to probing CardBus devices.
You may also need to play with IRQs once it's seen by the Card
Services. On my Sony, the card would prevent the modem from working
if it took IRQ 4. The card will configure at IRQ 5 but it doesn't
work. I kept excluding interrupts until it started working (you can
see which IRQ it's using by running "/sbin/cardctl config").
Good luck.
Ron Hitchens (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Markus Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi wizards,
>
> I am about to run screaming around the house... Has anyone ever
> successfully set up a Linksys Etherfast 10/100 Cardbus network card on a
>
> notebook with a Cirrus PD6832 cardbus controller?? If so, PLEASE tell me
>
> your secrets!
>
> I am currently trying this with a 2.0.36-1 kernel, pcmcia card services
> 3.0.6, no special options. My modem card is recognized and configured
> without any trouble while the network card keeps showing up as an
> anonymous memory device. I have compiled the tulip.c driver module as
> described on the Linksys web site, but this is not (yet) the problem
> since this module does not get started so far (because the card is not
> recognized).
>
> The debugging tools which come with pcmcia-cs-3.0.6 also do not help
> much. The CIS dump shows nothing what so ever (no information available)
>
> - so I get the impression that there is some fundamental problem with
> this card / card bus controller combo..?
>
> Under Windows 98 the card works just fine, so the HW is ok.
>
> Any help highly appreciated, please answer by email or here.
>
> Markus
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Paul Bary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba.conf and host allow
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 23:24:03 -0700
I use samba on a small nt/linux/netware network. Samba is functioning well.
I am attempting (without suucess) to set the host allow parameter in
smb.conf ....nothing fancy, I want to set it to allow access
only from within my specific subnet. I have added the parameter specifying
10.26.48. as the allowed
subnet range .... after doing this however I cannot connect to the server
from any workstations and
get and unable to connect, network is busy error message .... if I remove
this hosts alllow parameter, connections continue normally.
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious and was hoping someone might
comment...
Paul
------------------------------
From: "tonni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sharing a cablemodem (with 1 NIC?)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 07:18:58 GMT
IS THAT FULL BROADBAND CABLEMODEM OR JUST HALF WAY LIKE I HAVE .
I JUST PLUG THE CABLEMODEM TO THE UPLINK PORT AND CONFIGURE ONE LOCAL
NETWORK WITH A GATEWAY 193.168.101.1
AND MY MODEM CONNECT TRU A WEB BROWSER WITH IP 192.168.100.1 WHICH IS THE
GATEWAY FOR MY FIRST NETWORK
WITH A MASK 255.255.255.0 IT WORK GOOD AS A ROUTER AND I HAVE ALL MY
CLIENTS RUNINIG NT WKST AND I HAVE NT SERVER
THIS IS AT HOME HEHE 12 COMPUTERS TOTAL NOW I;\'M TRYING TO
CONFIGURE SAMBA AND A FTP SERVER TO SEE MY NT SERVER HD
GOOD UCK FOR YA LET ME KNOW IF U GOT IT WORKING
ONE THING I FIND TRYING TO SETUP THIS THING IT ONLY WILL WORK
TRU GATEWAY IPS IT IS SIMPLE TO SETUP MAKE SURE YOU GOT A DESTINATION IP EX
192.168.101.1 AND IT WILL BE A GATEWAY ON THE WINDOWS MACHINE CYA
Tom Shealy wrote in message <774e7d$4s9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Is there any way to build a network where the server and clients all plug
>into the same hub (and where the cablemodem plugs into the uplink port on
>that hub?)
>
>I was wondering because I only have one ethernet card in the server
>computer. (I don't want to buy another because the server is a nubus-based
>ppc macintosh running mklinux and i've found old apple peripherals to be
>overpriced and hard to find...esp for nubus architecture) Still, I'd
rather
>use the mklinux box as a server than i would my pentium because I dual-boot
>the pentium, but don't use the mac for anything.
>
>I was hoping there might be a way to make the clients look for the
>particular MAC address of the server, and then configure the server
normally
>with the cable-modem. Any ideas?
>
>
>Thanks,
>-Tom
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,alt.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: BellAtlantic.net and PPP 2.3.5
Date: 10 Jan 1999 07:30:19 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Frank Hale writes:
> > I followed the Linux dialing instructions and connected first time with
> > the new version of PPP 2.3.5.
>
> Those instructions are unnecessarily complicated for any modern Linux
> distribution. They are more appropriate for something like Slackware 2.3.
>
It might be overly complicated but it works and to have a decent ISP
acknowledge that people actually use Linux to connect to the internet is
something that I have seen very little of. I did alot of research in my
area for ISPs who support linux or provide instructions to connect to
there service via Linux and ATT Worldnet is the only one I found.
Anyway the whole connection process is wrapped up in 1 perl script which
can hardly be called complicated. All you have to do is plug in your
user data. Simple!! Thats what I was looking for and something
BellAtlantic.net did not provide.
--
From: Frank Hale
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 7205161
Homepage: http://members.xoom.com/frankhale/
Jade: http://jade.netpedia.net/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SPX sockets (kernel 2.2.0-pre5)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 06:40:24 GMT
> > I have to write a small client for a server that uses SPX. All I need to
> > know is how to get an SPX socket and how to connect to the server (I know
> > ...
> It basicly works as with TCP sockets. You create the socket with
>
> sk = socket(PF_IPX, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
> ...
Thanks a lot!
Urugvajo
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.powerpc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.lynx,comp.os.mach,comp.os.magic-cap,comp.os.minix,comp.os.misc,comp.os.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.comm,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.compatibility.win95,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.financial,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.utilities.win3x,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.winsock.mail,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.winsock.news,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.word-proc,comp.os.ms-windows.ce,comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Subject: BRAND NEW COMIC PICTURES
Date: 10 Jan 1999 07:06:25 GMT
www.focus-asia.com/home/placez/comics.htm
wnowivchvqwnkjsgseeozvxeuxmljcugxuojog
------------------------------
From: "Hervey Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Forwarding & Routing
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 22:39:14 -0800
Check out http://www.xos.nl - drill into the papers section - theres a good
paper on ipfwadm.
Terra wrote in message ...
>I currently use my linux box as a router and ip forwarding for a couple of
>winblows boxes. I would like to restrict access to certain sites or ip
>addresses. I cant seem to get the ipfwadm or route command to do this.
>What am I doing wrong??
>
>-ff
>
>
------------------------------
From: jongarmpark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Q] Brief Exp. for networking.
Date: 10 Jan 1999 06:48:12 GMT
Well. Strangely, it works.
What I just did is to :
dumppnp ( pnpdump? using the isapnptool ) > /etc/isapnp.conf
isapnp /etc/isapnp.conf
But I don't think it solved the problem.
Because after I rebooted, I didn't issued the command.
Well.. Isn't it strange?
Not working device starts to work after I posted "question" in this
group.
:)
( Repairman Syndrom ? )
--
============================================
JongAm Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Vision Lab.
============================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Branston)
Subject: Re: Networking Linux to Win95
Date: 10 Jan 1999 08:27:46 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7 Jan 1999 21:07:23 GMT, Paul Branston
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> appeared to write:
It turned out to be an IRQ conflict. The second column of
/proc/interrupts never moved from 0 . I fiddled with
different settings of IRQ's and base io and now it
all works.
Thanks for the help.
Cheers,
Paul.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Standard-Nutzer Holger)
Subject: Re: proxy server
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 18:06:09 +0100
In article <sKnl2.94$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"greyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Many, many ISPs and companies use Squid. It is not immediately straight
> forward to install and configure correctly, but it works great. You can find
> it at http://squid.nlanr.net along with plenty of info.
>>
>>Can someone give me some good ideas to build a personal proxy server?
>>
>>thanks in advance.
Or, for the dumb-minded of us (including me), try wwwoffle. Easy to
install, easy to configure (via your www browser). Added to the
proxy functions in can store www requests when you're offline and
accomplish them when going online.
Holger
------------------------------
From: Nickolai Sergienko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Diald and routing!
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:33:17 +0100
Hi!
I've recently upgraded my diald (from 0.14 to 0.16). The setup is as
follows: Linux box provides Internet access (via modem) to the Windows
95/98 workstations, which are on the Ethernet. And I strongly need
Dial-on-demand service, such as diald. After upgrading I have a problem
with the routing: I can't ping the internal network from the Linux
machine, and I also can't ping Linux from Windows machines when diald is
running. And it's ok, when diald is not running. Seems like these packets
are going to 'sl0' interface and get filtered.
What am I doing wrong? I would greatly appreciate if someone who uses
similar setup sends me his/her diald.conf file.
Best regards,
Nickolai
------------------------------
From: "Johan H�gdahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: D-Link DFE-530TX PCI
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 10:33:16 +0100
I can't get the card working, any sugestions on drivers ?
Johan
------------------------------
From: Athan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: win98, winNT, and Linux
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:53:17 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read the mini how to
install order which worked for me
win98
winNT
linux > don't put LILO on MBR
and then read how to crete the image
something like dd and copy the link in boot.ini in the proper way
that is all.
Athan
CPA wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to put three OS in a hard drive which are WIN98, WinNT
> Workstation, and Linux. Could someone please tell me how should I patition
> the harddrive. Or youu can direct me to a website if you know one.
>
> Many thanks
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:51:10 +0100
From: "Wout Verschueren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAM authentication failure with ftp
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I set up a RH 5.2 Linux on a Compaq machine as a server.
When I try to ftp from another machine or from the server itself as a
legimate user, following error appears in the loggings:
lserver1 PAM-pwdb [...]:1 authentication failure; (uid=0) -> wout for
ftp service
lserv er1 ftpd: lserver1: connected IDLE [...] failed login from
lserver1 [ip-addr], wout
Anonymous ftp can log on.
When changing the specified line in the /etc/pam.d/ftp file i can log
on with whatever password i give. This is defenitly not the solution i
wanted.
Contents of the /etc/pam.d/ftp file:
auth required /lib/security/pam_listfiles.so item=user
sense=deny file=/etc/ftpusers onerr=succeed
auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so shadow nullok <-----
auth required /lib/security/pam_shells.so
account required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so
session required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so
- --
Wout Verschueren - Origin Belgium
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP public key via http://www.surfnet.nl/pgp
RSA key-ID: 0x941A8863, DSS key-id: 0x14F2E762
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0
Comment: RSA key-ID: 0x941A8863, DSS key-id: 0x14F2E762
iQA/AwUBNphp2vZvq7kU8udiEQJ49QCdHM6DcbhtclWDMSSdlS433UObu3sAoOB3
b2XGv4mcjyA3fjT7NwdW+GBo
=ynv/
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: Athan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Win98 - Linux [Which FAST protocol ?]
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:56:03 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
I have a win98 and Linux box with 2 isa 3c509tp cards,
which protocol should I use for fast connections except TCP/IP
Thank you
Athan
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: * Need MX in POP3 form
Date: 10 Jan 1999 10:04:13 GMT
hello everybody,
I need to found a machine connected to the Net and who can provide
for me a MX backup for two machines in a ampr.org subdomain
if possible in a pop3 account form , after it's easy for me
to retrive my subdomain trafic with fetchmail.
I can't found that here in my country because in France we haven't
a ampr.org machine connected to the net like in Usa.
If you can provide that for me please let me know :-)
Many thanks per advance , 73'Tony
============
Tony Schonfeld - F5GIT - GRENOBLE - Phone: (33) 0610104815
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - WWW: http://schonfeld.iscool.net
Hamnet (ax25): [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom)
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.linux.isp,;,alt.linux,;,alt.os.linux,;,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,;,comp.os.linux.help,;,comp.os.linux.misc,;,;,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: ppp with isdn
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:56:57 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi I'm really new to Linux and need a little help.
I just bought RedHat 5.2 and installed it on my Pentium200.
Installation went flawlessly. X windows is up and running. Now I
want to connect to the internet.
I have a 3com Impact IQ external ISDN adapter connected to com2.
I've been using the control panel utility to configure my computer in
X. I used the modem utility to configure the modem on com2. I then
added the device 'ppp0' in network devices. I then entered my
username and password for my ISP for this device.
Now what? How do I connect to my ISP?
Thanks for the help,
Tom Bissell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Athan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RJ-45 network needs hub ?
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:11:36 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are lucky
I bought mine from
www.misco.co.uk
the code is ... W25463 10m 9.75 ex VAT
I order it for 3 days delivery and came within 1 [it's chipper like that]
I coudn't find it in Portsmouth....
Athan
PS remember to change the delivery date
Lorenzo Delloni wrote:
> I reported before a problem of connection between my labtop and my Linux
> PC. I did not mention that the Etherlink III 3 com card was provided
> with a cable allowing direct connection of the computer to a RJ-45
> socket and that I plug this cable to the RJ-45 out of my NE2000
> compatible card. I have asked for advices in some of the tones of PC
> shops close to Tottenham in London. If I exclude the stupids remarks
> concerning the fact that I am not able to install the driver and they
> can do it for me for �45 !!! or that it's not possible Linux with Win95
> ! The most raisonable remark was that for a RJ-45 network, even between
> two computers, you definitely need a hub. Is that true ? I am a bit
> sceptic of what these computers vendors say !
>
> Thanks
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Branston)
Subject: Re: 3com 3c509tp problems being detected
Date: 9 Jan 1999 15:37:11 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5 Jan 1999 18:18:48 GMT, Daryl Hurd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> appeared to write:
>I have a 3com 3c509tp card. It was detected during install and I was able
>to configure the NIC. It worked fine and BootP was running with TCP/IP
>protocol.
>
>I installed a SoundBlaster Pro and the NIC stopped working. Linux will not
>detect the card during bootup and ifconfig doesn't allow me to add the NIC.
>
>Does anybody know how to re-detect a NIC like the installation does?
>Linuxconf still has the same settings as before and have not changed. I
>have tried removing the sound card and re-booting but it still doesn't
>work.
>
>I am stumped... I have tried to manually add the irq and io in linuxconf to
>the card's orginal settings.
It does sound like an irq conflict, what does /proc/interrupts say ?
Figure out the interrupts which the card are using are reset one or
the other.
Paul.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (smile)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: What linux works best with a cable modem?
Date: 10 Jan 1999 10:11:36 GMT
I have a cable modem Com/21 and an ethernet card Tbase/10 on ISA slot.
Would like to know which linux would work best with my configuration.
I've got also amd 350 and w95(intend to install w98).
Would appreciate any advice.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why can PPP configure the DNS server address dynamically?
Date: 10 Jan 1999 10:24:35 +0000
George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a technical reason why PPP can't configure the ISP's DNS
> server address dynamically?
More religious than techical.
RFC1877 (writtern by Microsoft) is an abominable violation of protocol
layering and so the people responsible for pppd refuse to implement it
even though it is trivial to do so. The correct solution is to use
DHCP but the fear is that if RFC1877 is supported in pppd people won't
bother to implement the correct solution.
Not only will they not implement RFC1877 they won't even acknowledge
the existance of any person who considers the possibility that it
should be implemented. Several times over the last year I've tried to
ask if my trivial patch for RFC1877 support could be incorporated into
pppd. I have never had any reply either positive or negative.
ftp://ftp.wcl.bham.ac.uk/pub/bam/patches/pppd-2.3.5-get-ms-dns.diff
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Art Asbury)
Subject: Re: SIOCADDRT: Invalid Argument
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:37:51 GMT
On Fri, 08 Jan 1999 21:50:34 -0500, "Brian D. Cook"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a dual 133 linux box. It's got two nic's in it, both are
>3c905b-tx's. When I boot, I get this error, SIOCADDRT: Invalid
>Argument.
>Any Suggestions would be appreciated.
Yes any suggestions. I have been chasing this for weeks.
>Brian D. Cook
>Web Space Administrator
>Greer Toyota-Subaru
>Wappingers Falls, NY
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Art Asbury)
Subject: Re: pppd error message
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:40:59 GMT
On Wed, 6 Jan 1999 08:23:31 -0800, "Darrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You me and several others. I have one machine with RH5.1 which
I updated with the RPM 2.3.5 from RH and another with RH5.2 which
includes 2.3.5 both give the same error.
>I get an error message of:
>
>pppd: demand dialling is not supported by kernel driver version 2.2.0
>
>But my ppp version is 2.3.5-2.
>
>Can anyone tell me what kernel driver version this message is referring to??
>
>I'm trying to get on demand dialing to work, any pointers that would lead me
>in that direction would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Thanks
>
>
------------------------------
From: Joachim Knoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ISDN worked fine, now strange
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 12:10:37 +0100
Hello all,
I built a server with 2 icn4B and 2 AVMB1 Cards to handle RAWIP Lines to 8
other stations. The Server is Suse5.3, the clients are 5.0
Till friday all went fine, since then I see the dialout, the isdn
connection is established on both sides, but IP pakets are all gone.
No Ping is send back, traceroute hangs with * *
Has anyone else seen such s behavior? I searched 2 days an have no idea
where to start...
Bye,
Achim
===========================================================================
"UNIX and OS/2 are operating systems. Windows is a shell, and
DOS is a boot virus"
(found in the news)
===========================================================================
Key fingerprint = 44 C0 0D D5 8C 3D B4 91 01 5C AB 48 F2 30 58 C0
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
